Stanton Robert, Guertler Diana, Duncan Mitch J, Vandelanotte Corneel
School of Medical and Applied Sciences, Central Queensland University, Bruce Highway, Rockhampton QLD 4702, Australia.
Centre for Physical Activity Studies, School of Human, Health and Social Sciences, Central Queensland University, Bruce Highway, Rockhampton QLD 4702, Australia; Institute for Social Medicine and Prevention, Faculty of Medicine, University of Greifswald, 17475 Greifswald, Germany.
Gait Posture. 2016 Jul;48:230-236. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2016.06.013. Epub 2016 Jun 14.
ActivPAL3c triaxial accelerometers are increasingly used to assess physical activity and sedentary behaviours. However, little is known how attachment site (left vs. right or upper vs. lower thigh) affects activPAL3c accelerometer outcomes. Twenty-eight adults wore four activPAL3c accelerometers attached 2cm above and below the midpoint of the left and right thigh during five minutes of laboratory-based walking at a self-selected pace, treadmill walking at 0.89 and 1.56m/s, and treadmill running at 2.22m/s, and during approximately seven hours of free-living conditions. One-way ANOVA revealed no statistically significant differences in accelerometer output between ActivPAL3c accelerometers at these locations during both laboratory-based, and free-living conditions. Intraclass correlation coefficients showed a high level of agreement between activPAL3c accelerometers during laboratory and free living activities (ICC(2,1) 0.76-1.00). The attachment sites used in this study do not appear to significantly influence outcomes for step count, sitting or walking time, or number of postural transitions from triaxial activPAL3c accelerometers during laboratory-based walking or free-living conditions. Therefore if necessary, to enhance participant compliance during monitoring periods, these sites could be used interchangeably. Studies of longer duration incorporating additional laboratory and recreational activities are needed to confirm these findings.
ActivPAL3c三轴加速度计越来越多地用于评估身体活动和久坐行为。然而,关于附着部位(左大腿与右大腿或大腿上部与下部)如何影响ActivPAL3c加速度计的结果,人们知之甚少。28名成年人在以自选速度进行5分钟的实验室步行、以0.89米/秒和1.56米/秒的速度在跑步机上行走、以2.22米/秒的速度在跑步机上跑步以及大约7小时的自由生活条件下,佩戴了四个ActivPAL3c加速度计,分别附着在左、右大腿中点上方和下方2厘米处。单因素方差分析显示,在实验室条件和自由生活条件下,这些位置的ActivPAL3c加速度计之间的加速度计输出没有统计学上的显著差异。组内相关系数显示,在实验室活动和自由生活活动期间,ActivPAL3c加速度计之间具有高度一致性(ICC(2,1)为0.76 - 1.00)。本研究中使用的附着部位似乎不会显著影响在实验室步行或自由生活条件下,来自三轴ActivPAL3c加速度计的步数、坐姿或步行时间或姿势转换次数的结果。因此,如果有必要,为了提高监测期间参与者的依从性,这些部位可以互换使用。需要进行纳入更多实验室和娱乐活动的更长时间的研究来证实这些发现。