Scudiero Elia, Lesch Scott M, Corwin Dennis L
J Environ Qual. 2016 Jul;45(4):1226-33. doi: 10.2134/jeq2015.09.0458.
Soil spatial variability has a profound influence on most agronomic and environmental processes at field and landscape scales, including site-specific management, vadose zone hydrology and transport, and soil quality. Mobile sensors are a practical means of mapping spatial variability because their measurements serve as a proxy for many soil properties, provided a sensor-soil calibration is conducted. A viable means of calibrating sensor measurements over soil properties is through linear regression modeling of sensor and target property data. In the present study, two sensor-directed, model-based, sampling scheme delineation methods were compared to validate recent applications of soil apparent electrical conductivity (EC)-directed spatial simulated annealing against the more established EC-directed response surface sampling design (RSSD) approach. A 6.8-ha study area near San Jacinto, CA, was surveyed for EC, and 30 soil sampling locations per sampling strategy were selected. Spatial simulated annealing and RSSD were compared for sensor calibration to a target soil property (i.e., salinity) and for evenness of spatial coverage of the study area, which is beneficial for mapping nontarget soil properties (i.e., those not correlated with EC). The results indicate that the linear modeling EC-salinity calibrations obtained from the two sampling schemes provided salinity maps characterized by similar errors. The maps of nontarget soil properties show similar errors across sampling strategies. The Spatial Simulated Annealing methodology is, therefore, validated, and its use in agronomic and environmental soil science applications is justified.
土壤空间变异性对田间和景观尺度上的大多数农艺和环境过程具有深远影响,包括精准农业管理、包气带水文与运移以及土壤质量。移动传感器是绘制空间变异性的一种实用手段,因为只要进行了传感器-土壤校准,其测量结果就能代表许多土壤特性。通过对传感器和目标特性数据进行线性回归建模,是校准传感器对土壤特性测量的一种可行方法。在本研究中,对两种基于传感器和模型的采样方案划定方法进行了比较,以验证土壤表观电导率(EC)导向的空间模拟退火法相对于更成熟的EC导向响应面采样设计(RSSD)方法的最新应用。对加利福尼亚州圣哈辛托附近一个6.8公顷的研究区域进行了EC测量,并为每种采样策略选择了30个土壤采样位置。比较了空间模拟退火法和RSSD法在传感器校准到目标土壤特性(即盐度)以及研究区域空间覆盖均匀性方面的情况,空间覆盖均匀性有利于绘制非目标土壤特性(即与EC不相关的特性)。结果表明,从两种采样方案获得的线性建模EC-盐度校准结果所生成的盐度图具有相似的误差。非目标土壤特性图在不同采样策略下显示出相似的误差。因此,空间模拟退火方法得到了验证,其在农艺和环境土壤科学应用中的使用是合理的。