Getz Godfrey S, Reardon Catherine A
From the Department of Pathology (G.S.G.) and Ben May Institute for Cancer Biology (C.A.R.), University of Chicago, IL.
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2016 Sep;36(9):1734-41. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.116.306874. Epub 2016 Jul 7.
Murine models of atherosclerosis are useful for investigating the environmental and genetic influences on lesion formation and composition. Apoe(-/-) and Ldlr(-/-) mice are the 2 most extensively used models. The models differ in important ways with respect to the precise mechanism by which their absence enhances atherosclerosis, including differences in plasma lipoproteins. The majority of the gene function studies have utilized only 1 model, with the results being generalized to atherogenic mechanisms. In only a relatively few cases have studies been conducted in both atherogenic murine models. This review will discuss important differences between the 2 atherogenic models and will point out studies that have been performed in the 2 models where results are comparable and those where different results were obtained.
动脉粥样硬化的小鼠模型对于研究环境和基因对病变形成及组成的影响很有用。载脂蛋白E基因敲除(Apoe(-/-))和低密度脂蛋白受体基因敲除(Ldlr(-/-))小鼠是两种使用最广泛的模型。这两种模型在其缺失增强动脉粥样硬化的确切机制方面存在重要差异,包括血浆脂蛋白的差异。大多数基因功能研究仅使用了一种模型,并将结果推广到致动脉粥样硬化机制。只有相对少数情况下在两种致动脉粥样硬化小鼠模型中都进行了研究。本综述将讨论这两种致动脉粥样硬化模型之间的重要差异,并指出在两种模型中进行的研究,其中结果具有可比性以及那些获得不同结果的研究。