Dane Dawn E, Dane Andrew B, Crowther Edward R
J Chiropr Educ. 2016 Oct;30(2):131-137. doi: 10.7899/JCE-15-26. Epub 2016 Jul 7.
This study explored how chiropractic interns applied evidenced-based concepts, the sources of evidence they used, and how useful they perceived these sources to be in clinical decision making.
A questionnaire containing 13 items in a Likert 5-point scale was administered to 28 chiropractic interns to gather information on the evidence types they commonly accessed and their perceived usefulness of these sources in clinical decision making. The interns were in the 8th semester of the training program.
There was a 93% (n = 26) response rate. Clinical guidelines were rated as the most helpful resource in clinical decision making (81%), followed by lecture materials (77%), journals (54%), databases (50%), and textbooks (35%). Students recognized scientific evidence as the most important aspect in clinical decision making. They found their personal experience and the views of their clinician to be equally important and patient preference the least.
Interns routinely employed high-quality levels of evidence in clinical decision making. They also considered their early, limited clinical experience as important as that of their clinical supervisor in decision making. This finding should be investigated further.
本研究探讨了脊椎按摩疗法实习生如何应用循证概念、他们所使用的证据来源,以及他们认为这些来源在临床决策中有多大用处。
向28名脊椎按摩疗法实习生发放了一份包含13个项目的五点李克特量表问卷,以收集他们常用的证据类型以及他们认为这些来源在临床决策中的有用性的信息。这些实习生处于培训项目的第八学期。
回复率为93%(n = 26)。临床指南被评为临床决策中最有帮助的资源(81%),其次是讲座材料(77%)、期刊(54%)、数据库(50%)和教科书(35%)。学生们认为科学证据是临床决策中最重要的方面。他们发现自己的个人经验和临床医生的观点同样重要,而患者偏好最不重要。
实习生在临床决策中常规采用高质量的证据水平。他们还认为自己早期有限的临床经验在决策中与临床带教老师的经验同样重要。这一发现应进一步研究。