Potter Jennifer, Brown Leanne, Williams Rebecca L, Byles Julie, Collins Clare E
School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Newcastle, Callaghan 2308, Australia.
Department of Rural Health, University of Newcastle, Tamworth 2308, Australia.
Int J Mol Sci. 2016 Jul 5;17(7):1052. doi: 10.3390/ijms17071052.
Dietary patterns influence cancer risk. However, systematic reviews have not evaluated relationships between a priori defined diet quality scores and adult cancer risk and mortality. The aims of this systematic review are to (1) describe diet quality scores used in cohort or cross-sectional research examining cancer outcomes; and (2) describe associations between diet quality scores and cancer risk and mortality. The protocol was registered in Prospero, and a systematic search using six electronic databases was conducted through to December 2014. Records were assessed for inclusion by two independent reviewers, and quality was evaluated using a validated tool. Sixty-four studies met inclusion criteria from which 55 different diet quality scores were identified. Of the 35 studies investigating diet quality and cancer risk, 60% (n = 21) found a positive relationship. Results suggest no relationship between diet quality scores and overall cancer risk. Inverse associations were found for diet quality scores and risk of postmenopausal breast, colorectal, head, and neck cancer. No consistent relationships between diet quality scores and cancer mortality were found. Diet quality appears to be related to site-specific adult cancer risk. The relationship with cancer mortality is less conclusive, suggesting additional factors impact overall cancer survival. Development of a cancer-specific diet quality score for application in prospective epidemiology and in public health is warranted.
饮食模式会影响癌症风险。然而,系统评价尚未评估预先定义的饮食质量评分与成人癌症风险及死亡率之间的关系。本系统评价的目的是:(1)描述在队列研究或横断面研究中用于检验癌症结局的饮食质量评分;(2)描述饮食质量评分与癌症风险及死亡率之间的关联。该方案已在国际前瞻性系统评价注册库(Prospero)登记,并通过六个电子数据库进行了截至2014年12月的系统检索。由两名独立评审员评估记录是否纳入研究,并使用经过验证的工具评估质量。64项研究符合纳入标准,从中确定了55种不同的饮食质量评分。在35项调查饮食质量与癌症风险的研究中,60%(n = 21)发现存在正相关关系。结果表明饮食质量评分与总体癌症风险之间无关联。发现饮食质量评分与绝经后乳腺癌、结直肠癌、头颈癌风险呈负相关。未发现饮食质量评分与癌症死亡率之间存在一致的关系。饮食质量似乎与特定部位的成人癌症风险有关。与癌症死亡率的关系尚不明确,表明还有其他因素影响总体癌症生存率。有必要制定一种特定于癌症的饮食质量评分,用于前瞻性流行病学和公共卫生领域。