Kayiga Herbert, Ajeani Judith, Kiondo Paul, Kaye Dan K
Makerere Univesity College of Health Sciences, Directorate of Obstetrics and Gynecology, P.O.BOX 7072, Kampala, Uganda.
Obstetrician/ Gynecologist, Mulago Hospital, P.O.BOX 7051, Kampala, Uganda.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016 Jul 11;16(1):152. doi: 10.1186/s12884-016-0949-1.
Obstructed labour remains a major cause of maternal morbidity and mortality whose complications can be reduced with improved quality of obstetric care. The objective was to assess whether criteria-based audit improves quality of obstetric care provided to women with obstructed labour in Mulago hospital, Uganda.
Using criteria-based audit, management of obstructed labour was analyzed prospectively in two audits. Six standards of care were compared. An initial audit of 180 patients was conducted in September/October 2013. The Audit results were shared with key stakeholders. Gaps in patient management were identified and recommendations for improving obstetric care initiated. Six standards of care (intravenous fluids, intravenous antibiotics, monitoring of maternal vital signs, bladder catheterization, delivery within two hours, and blood grouping and cross matching) were implemented. A re-audit of 180 patients with obstructed labour was conducted four months later to evaluate the impact of these recommendations. The results of the two audits were compared. In-depth interviews and focus group discussions were conducted among healthcare providers to identify factors that could have influenced the audit results.
There was improvement in two standards of care (intravenous fluids and intravenous antibiotic administration) 58.9 % vs. 86.1 %; p < 0.001 and 21.7 % vs. 50.5 %; P < 0.001 respectively after the second audit. There was no improvement in vital sign monitoring, delivery within two hours or blood grouping and cross matching. There was a decline in bladder catheterization (94 % vs. 68.9 %; p < 0.001. The overall mean care score in the first and second audits was 55.1 and 48.2 % respectively, p = 0.19. Healthcare factors (negative attitude, low numbers, poor team work, low motivation), facility factors (poor supervision, stock-outs of essential supplies, absence of protocols) and patient factors (high patient load, poor compliance to instructions) contributed to poor quality of care.
Introduction of criteria based audit in the management of obstructed labour led to measurable improvements in only two out of six standards of care. The extent to which criteria based audit may improve quality of obstetric care depends on having basic effective healthcare systems in place.
产程梗阻仍然是孕产妇发病和死亡的主要原因,通过提高产科护理质量可以减少其并发症。目的是评估基于标准的审核是否能提高乌干达穆拉戈医院为产程梗阻妇女提供的产科护理质量。
采用基于标准的审核,对两次审核中产程梗阻的管理进行前瞻性分析。比较了六项护理标准。2013年9月/10月对180例患者进行了首次审核。审核结果与关键利益相关者分享。确定了患者管理中的差距,并启动了改善产科护理的建议。实施了六项护理标准(静脉输液、静脉抗生素、产妇生命体征监测、膀胱插管、两小时内分娩以及血型鉴定和交叉配血)。四个月后对180例产程梗阻患者进行了重新审核,以评估这些建议的影响。比较了两次审核的结果。对医疗保健提供者进行了深入访谈和焦点小组讨论,以确定可能影响审核结果的因素。
两项护理标准(静脉输液和静脉抗生素给药)有改善,第二次审核后分别从58.9%提高到86.1%;p<0.001以及从21.7%提高到50.5%;P<0.001。生命体征监测、两小时内分娩或血型鉴定和交叉配血方面没有改善。膀胱插管有所下降(94%对68.9%;p<0.001)。第一次和第二次审核的总体平均护理得分分别为55.1%和48.2%,p = 0.19。医疗保健因素(消极态度、人数少、团队合作差、积极性低)、设施因素(监督不力、基本用品缺货、缺乏规程)和患者因素(患者负荷高、对医嘱依从性差)导致了护理质量差。
在产程梗阻管理中引入基于标准的审核仅使六项护理标准中的两项得到了可衡量的改善。基于标准的审核对产科护理质量的改善程度取决于是否具备基本有效的医疗保健系统。