Suppr超能文献

种植体基台材料对不同全瓷冠系统颜色的影响。

Influence of implant abutment material on the color of different ceramic crown systems.

作者信息

Dede Doğu Ömür, Armağanci Arzu, Ceylan Gözlem, Celik Ersan, Cankaya Soner, Yilmaz Burak

机构信息

Assistant Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Ordu University, Ordu, Turkey.

Practitioner, Samsun Public Oral Health Center, Samsun, Turkey.

出版信息

J Prosthet Dent. 2016 Nov;116(5):764-769. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.04.004. Epub 2016 Jul 9.

Abstract

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

Ceramics are widely used for anterior restorations; however, clinical color reproduction still constitutes a challenge particularly when the ceramic crowns are used on titanium implant abutments.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this in vitro study was to investigate the effect of implant abutment material on the color of different ceramic material systems.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Forty disks (11×1.5 mm, shade A2) were fabricated from medium-opacity (mo) and high-translucency (ht) lithium disilicate (IPS e.max) blocks, an aluminous ceramic (VITA In-Ceram Alumina), and a zirconia (Zirkonzahn) ceramic system. Disks were fabricated to represent 3 different implant abutments (zirconia, gold-palladium, and titanium) and dentin (composite resin, A2 shade) as background (11×2 mm). Disk-shaped composite resin specimens in A2 shade were fabricated to represent the cement layer. The color measurements of ceramic specimens were made on composite resin abutment materials using a spectrophotometer. CIELab color coordinates were recorded, and the color coordinates measured on composite resin background served as the control group. Color differences (ΔE) between the control and test groups were calculated. The data were analyzed with 2-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and compared with the Tukey HSD test (α=.05).

RESULTS

The ceramics system, abutment material, and their interaction were significant for ΔE values (P<.001). Clinically unacceptable results (ΔE>2.25) were observed for lithium disilicate ceramics on titanium abutments (2.46-2.50). The ΔE values of lithium disilicate ceramics for gold-palladium and titanium abutments were significantly higher than for other groups (P<.05).

CONCLUSION

The color results (ΔE>2.25) of an implant-supported lithium disilicate ceramic restoration may be clinically unacceptable if it is fabricated over a titanium abutment. Zirconia may be a more suitable abutment material for implant-supported ceramic restorations.

摘要

问题陈述

陶瓷材料广泛应用于前牙修复;然而,临床颜色再现仍是一项挑战,尤其是当陶瓷冠用于钛种植体基台时。

目的

本体外研究的目的是调查种植体基台材料对不同陶瓷材料系统颜色的影响。

材料与方法

用中等透明度(mo)和高透明度(ht)的二硅酸锂(IPS e.max)块体、铝基陶瓷(VITA In-Ceram Alumina)和氧化锆(Zirkonzahn)陶瓷系统制作40个圆盘(11×1.5 mm,A2色)。制作圆盘以代表3种不同的种植体基台(氧化锆、金钯合金和钛)以及作为背景的牙本质(复合树脂,A2色)(11×2 mm)。制作A2色的圆盘状复合树脂标本以代表粘结剂层。使用分光光度计在复合树脂基台材料上对陶瓷标本进行颜色测量。记录CIELab颜色坐标,在复合树脂背景上测量的颜色坐标作为对照组。计算对照组和试验组之间的颜色差异(ΔE)。数据采用双向方差分析(ANOVA)进行分析,并与Tukey HSD检验进行比较(α = 0.05)。

结果

陶瓷系统、基台材料及其相互作用对ΔE值有显著影响(P < 0.001)。在钛基台上的二硅酸锂陶瓷观察到临床不可接受的结果(ΔE>2.25)(2.46 - 2.50)。二硅酸锂陶瓷在金钯合金和钛基台上的ΔE值显著高于其他组(P < 0.05)。

结论

如果种植体支持的二硅酸锂陶瓷修复体在钛基台上制作,其颜色结果(ΔE>2.25)在临床上可能不可接受。氧化锆可能是种植体支持的陶瓷修复体更合适的基台材料。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验