de Almeida João Ricardo Maltez, Gomes André Boechat, Barros Thomas Pitangueiras, Fahel Paulo Eduardo, Rocha Mário de Seixas
PhD, Physician, Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Clínica de Assistência à Mulher (CAM), Salvador, BA, Brazil.
Physician, Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Clínica de Assistência à Mulher (CAM), Salvador, BA, Brazil.
Radiol Bras. 2016 May-Jun;49(3):137-43. doi: 10.1590/0100-3984.2015.0021.
To determine the positive predictive value (PPV) and likelihood ratio for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) characteristics of category 4 lesions, as described in the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS(®)) lexicon, as well as to test the predictive performance of the descriptors using multivariate analysis and the area under the curve derived from a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.
This was a double-blind review study of 121 suspicious findings from 98 women examined between 2009 and 2013. The terminology was based on the 2013 edition of the BI-RADS.
Of the 121 suspicious findings, 53 (43.8%) were proven to be malignant lesions, with no significant difference between mass and non-mass enhancement (p = 0.846). The PPVs were highest for masses with a spiculated margin (71%) and round shape (63%), whereas segmental distribution achieved a high PPV (80%) for non-mass enhancement. Kinetic analyses performed poorly, except for type 3 curves applied to masses (PPV of 73%). Logistic regression models were significant for both patterns, although the results were better for masses, particularly when kinetic assessments were included (p = 0.015; pseudo R(2) = 0.48; area under the curve = 90%).
Some BI-RADS MRI descriptors have high PPV and good predictive performance-as demonstrated by ROC curve and multivariate analysis-when applied to BI-RADS category 4 findings. This may allow future stratification of this category.
确定乳腺影像报告和数据系统(BI-RADS(®))词典中所述的4类病变磁共振成像(MRI)特征的阳性预测值(PPV)和似然比,并使用多变量分析以及从受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线得出的曲线下面积来测试这些描述符的预测性能。
这是一项对121例可疑发现进行的双盲回顾性研究,这些可疑发现来自2009年至2013年间接受检查的98名女性。术语基于2013版的BI-RADS。
在121例可疑发现中,53例(43.8%)被证实为恶性病变,肿块和非肿块强化之间无显著差异(p = 0.846)。边缘呈毛刺状的肿块(71%)和圆形肿块(63%)的PPV最高,而节段性分布在非肿块强化中具有较高的PPV(80%)。动力学分析表现不佳,除了应用于肿块的3型曲线(PPV为73%)。两种模式的逻辑回归模型均具有显著性,尽管肿块的结果更好,特别是当纳入动力学评估时(p = 0.015;伪R(2)= 0.48;曲线下面积 = 90%)。
一些BI-RADS MRI描述符在应用于BI-RADS 4类发现时具有较高的PPV和良好的预测性能,这通过ROC曲线和多变量分析得到了证明。这可能有助于对该类别进行未来的分层。