Guay Joanne, Nishimori Mina, Kopp Sandra
Department of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jul 16;7(7):CD001893. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001893.pub2.
Gastrointestinal paralysis, nausea and vomiting and pain are major clinical problems following abdominal surgery. Anaesthetic and analgesic techniques that reduce pain and postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), while preventing or reducing postoperative ileus, may reduce postoperative morbidity, duration of hospitalization and hospital costs. This review was first published in 2001 and was updated by new review authors in 2016.
To compare effects of postoperative epidural analgesia with local anaesthetics versus postoperative systemic or epidural opioids in terms of return of gastrointestinal transit, postoperative pain control, postoperative vomiting, incidence of anastomotic leak, length of hospital stay and costs after abdominal surgery.
We identified trials by conducting computerized searches of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (2014, Issue 12), MEDLINE (from 1950 to December 2014) and EMBASE (from 1974 to December 2014) and by checking the reference lists of trials retained. When we reran the search in February 2016, we added 16 potential new studies of interest to the list of 'Studies awaiting classification' and will incorporate these studies into formal review findings during the next review update.
We included parallel randomized controlled trials comparing effects of postoperative epidural local anaesthetic versus regimens based on systemic or epidural opioids.
We rated the quality of studies by using the Cochrane 'Risk of bias' tool. Two review authors independently extracted data and judged the quality of evidence according to the GRADE (Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation Working Group) scale.
We included 128 trials with 8754 participants in the review, and 94 trials with 5846 participants in the analysis. Trials included in the review were funded as follows: charity (n = 19), departmental resources (n = 8), governmental sources (n = 15) and industry (in part or in total) (n = 15). The source of funding was not specified for the other studies.Results of 22 trials including 1138 participants show that an epidural containing a local anaesthetic will decrease the time required for return of gastrointestinal transit as measured by time to first flatus after an abdominal surgery (standardized mean difference (SMD) -1.28, 95% confidence interval (CI) -1.71 to -0.86; high quality of evidence; equivalent to 17.5 hours). The effect is proportionate to the concentration of local anaesthetic used. A total of 28 trials including 1559 participants reported a decrease in time to first faeces (stool) (SMD -0.67, 95% CI -0.86 to -0.47; low quality of evidence; equivalent to 22 hours). Thirty-five trials including 2731 participants found that pain on movement at 24 hours after surgery was also reduced (SMD -0.89, 95% CI -1.08 to -0.70; moderate quality of evidence; equivalent to 2.5 on scale from 0 to 10). From findings of 22 trials including 1154 participants we did not find a difference in the incidence of vomiting within 24 hours (risk ratio (RR) 0.84, 95% CI 0.57 to 1.23; low quality of evidence). From investigators in 17 trials including 848 participants we did not find a difference in the incidence of gastrointestinal anastomotic leak (RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.41 to 1.32; low quality of evidence). Researchers in 30 trials including 2598 participants noted that epidural analgesia reduced length of hospital stay for an open surgery (SMD -0.20, 95% CI -0.35 to -0.04; very low quality of evidence; equivalent to one day). Data on costs were very limited.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: An epidural containing a local anaesthetic, with or without the addition of an opioid, accelerates the return of gastrointestinal transit (high quality of evidence). An epidural containing a local anaesthetic with an opioid decreases pain after abdominal surgery (moderate quality of evidence). We did not find a difference in the incidence of vomiting or anastomotic leak (low quality of evidence). For open surgery, an epidural containing a local anaesthetic would reduce the length of hospital stay (very low quality of evidence).
胃肠麻痹、恶心呕吐和疼痛是腹部手术后的主要临床问题。能减轻疼痛和术后恶心呕吐(PONV),同时预防或减轻术后肠梗阻的麻醉和镇痛技术,可能会降低术后发病率、缩短住院时间并降低住院费用。本综述首次发表于2001年,2016年由新的综述作者进行了更新。
比较术后硬膜外使用局部麻醉药镇痛与术后全身或硬膜外使用阿片类药物在腹部手术后胃肠蠕动恢复、术后疼痛控制、术后呕吐、吻合口漏发生率、住院时间和费用方面的效果。
我们通过计算机检索Cochrane对照试验中心注册库(CENTRAL)(2014年第12期)、MEDLINE(从1950年至2014年12月)和EMBASE(从1974年至2014年12月)来识别试验,并检查纳入试验的参考文献列表。当我们在2016年2月重新进行检索时,我们将16项潜在的新的感兴趣的研究添加到了“等待分类的研究”列表中,并将在下次综述更新时将这些研究纳入正式的综述结果中。
我们纳入了比较术后硬膜外使用局部麻醉药与基于全身或硬膜外阿片类药物方案效果的平行随机对照试验。
我们使用Cochrane“偏倚风险”工具对研究质量进行评分。两位综述作者独立提取数据,并根据GRADE(推荐分级、评估、制定与评价工作组)量表判断证据质量。
我们在综述中纳入了128项试验,共8754名参与者,在分析中纳入了94项试验,共5846名参与者。纳入综述的试验的资金来源如下:慈善机构(n = 19)、部门资源(n = 8)、政府来源(n = 15)和行业(部分或全部)(n = 15)。其他研究未注明资金来源。22项试验(共1138名参与者)的结果表明,含有局部麻醉药的硬膜外麻醉会缩短腹部手术后胃肠蠕动恢复所需的时间,以首次排气时间衡量(标准化均数差(SMD)-1.28,95%置信区间(CI)-1.71至-0.86;证据质量高;相当于17.5小时)。该效果与所用局部麻醉药的浓度成比例。共有28项试验(共1559名参与者)报告首次排便时间缩短(SMD -0.67,95%CI -0.86至-0.47;证据质量低;相当于22小时)。35项试验(共2731名参与者)发现术后24小时活动时的疼痛也减轻了(SMD -0.89,95%CI -1.08至-0.70;证据质量中等;相当于0至10分制中的2.5分)。从22项试验(共1154名参与者)的结果中,我们未发现24小时内呕吐发生率有差异(风险比(RR)0.84,95%CI 0.57至1.23;证据质量低)。从17项试验(共848名参与者)的研究者处,我们未发现胃肠吻合口漏发生率有差异(RR 0.74,95%CI 0.41至1.32;证据质量低)。30项试验(共2598名参与者)的研究者指出,硬膜外镇痛缩短了开放手术的住院时间(SMD -0.20,95%CI -0.35至-0.04;证据质量极低;相当于1天)。关于费用的数据非常有限。
含有局部麻醉药的硬膜外麻醉,无论是否添加阿片类药物,均可加速胃肠蠕动恢复(证据质量高)。含有局部麻醉药和阿片类药物的硬膜外麻醉可减轻腹部手术后的疼痛(证据质量中等)。我们未发现呕吐或吻合口漏发生率有差异(证据质量低)。对于开放手术,含有局部麻醉药的硬膜外麻醉可缩短住院时间(证据质量极低)。