Gender Identity Development Service, Tavistock and Portman NHS Foundation Trust, Tavistock Centre, 120 Belsize Lane, London NW3 5BA, UK.
Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology &Neuroscience, King's College London, 16 De Crespigny Park, London SE5 8AF, UK.
Nat Rev Urol. 2016 Aug;13(8):456-62. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2016.128. Epub 2016 Jul 19.
Puberty suppression using gonadotropin-releasing-hormone analogues (GnRHa) has become increasingly accepted as an intervention during the early stages of puberty (Tanner stage 2-3) in individuals with clear signs of childhood-onset gender dysphoria. However, lowering the age threshold for using medical intervention for children with gender dysphoria is still a matter of contention, and is more controversial than treating the condition in adolescents and adults, as children with gender dysphoria are more likely to express an unstable pattern of gender variance. Furthermore, concerns have been expressed regarding the risks of puberty suppression, which are poorly understood, and the child's ability to make decisions and provide informed consent. However, even if the limited data available mean that it is not possible to make a conclusive treatment recommendation, some safety criteria for puberty suppression can be identified and applied.
促性腺激素释放激素类似物(GnRHa)的应用可抑制青春期的启动,目前已被广泛接受,尤其适用于性身份认同障碍患儿(Tanner 分期 2-3 期),此时患儿的青春期启动特征明显。然而,对于儿童性别认同障碍患者,降低采用医学干预的年龄门槛仍然存在争议,而且比治疗青少年和成年人患者更具争议性,因为性别认同障碍患儿更有可能表现出不稳定的性别差异模式。此外,对于青春期抑制的风险,人们的担忧还包括了解甚少、儿童的决策能力和提供知情同意的能力等问题。然而,即使目前有限的数据无法得出明确的治疗推荐,也可以确定并应用一些青春期抑制的安全标准。