Chaumeau V, Andolina C, Fustec B, Tuikue Ndam N, Brengues C, Herder S, Cerqueira D, Chareonviriyaphap T, Nosten F, Corbel V
Centre hospitalier universitaire de Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Maladies Infectieuses et Vecteurs, Ecologie, Génétique, Evolution et Contrôle, Institut de Recherche pour le Développement, Montpellier, France.
PLoS One. 2016 Jul 21;11(7):e0159160. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0159160. eCollection 2016.
Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qrtPCR) has made a significant improvement for the detection of Plasmodium in anopheline vectors. A wide variety of primers has been used in different assays, mostly adapted from molecular diagnosis of malaria in human. However, such an adaptation can impact the sensitivity of the PCR. Therefore we compared the sensitivity of five primer sets with different molecular targets on blood stages, sporozoites and oocysts standards of Plasmodium falciparum (Pf) and P. vivax (Pv). Dilution series of standard DNA were used to discriminate between methods at low concentrations of parasite and to generate standard curves suitable for the absolute quantification of Plasmodium sporozoites. Our results showed that the best primers to detect blood stages were not necessarily the best ones to detect sporozoites. Absolute detection threshold of our qrtPCR assay varied between 3.6 and 360 Pv sporozoites and between 6 and 600 Pf sporozoites per mosquito according to the primer set used in the reaction mix. In this paper, we discuss the general performance of each primer set and highlight the need to use efficient detection methods for transmission studies.
定量实时聚合酶链反应(qrtPCR)在按蚊媒介中疟原虫的检测方面取得了显著进展。在不同的检测方法中使用了各种各样的引物,这些引物大多改编自人类疟疾的分子诊断方法。然而,这种改编可能会影响PCR的灵敏度。因此,我们比较了针对恶性疟原虫(Pf)和间日疟原虫(Pv)血液阶段、子孢子和卵囊标准品的五个具有不同分子靶点的引物组的灵敏度。使用标准DNA的稀释系列来区分低浓度寄生虫情况下的不同方法,并生成适用于疟原虫子孢子绝对定量的标准曲线。我们的结果表明,检测血液阶段的最佳引物不一定是检测子孢子的最佳引物。根据反应混合物中使用的引物组,我们的qrtPCR检测的绝对检测阈值在每只蚊子3.6至360个Pv子孢子和6至600个Pf子孢子之间变化。在本文中,我们讨论了每个引物组的总体性能,并强调了在传播研究中使用高效检测方法的必要性。