Rippon Daniel, Milisen Koen, Detroyer Elke, Mukaetova-Ladinska Elizabeta, Harrison Beth, Schuurmans Marieke, Pryor Claire, Teodorczuk Andrew
Northumberland,Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust,Newcastle upon Tyne,UK.
Department of Public Health and Primary Care,Academic Centre for Nursing and Midwifery,KU Leuven,Leuven,Belgium.
Int Psychogeriatr. 2016 Nov;28(11):1879-1887. doi: 10.1017/S1041610216000983. Epub 2016 Jul 22.
Despite awareness of the negative health and financial outcomes of delirium, systems to routinely assess and manage the condition are absent in clinical practice. We report the development and pilot evaluation of a Delirium Early Monitoring System (DEMS), designed to be completed by non-medical staff to influence clinical processes within inpatient settings. Two versions of the DEMS are described based on a modified Confusion Assessment Method (DEMS-CAM) and Delirium Observation Screening Scale (DEMS-DOSS).
Both versions of DEMS were piloted on a 20-bedded Psychogeriatric ward over 6 weeks. Training was administered to ward staff on the use of each version of the DEMS and data were collected via electronic medical records and completed assessment sheets. The primary outcome was patterns of DEMS use and the secondary outcome was the initiation of delirium management protocols. Data regarding the use of the DEMS DOSS and DEMS CAMS were analyzed using χ 2 tests.
Completion rates for the DEMS CAM and DEMS DOSS were 79% and 68%, respectively. Non-medical staff were significantly more likely to use the DEMS-CAM as part of daily practice as opposed to the DEMS-DOSS (p<0.001). However, there was no difference between the use of the DEMS-CAM and DEMS-DOSS in triggering related actions such as documentation of assessment scores in patients' medical records and implementation of delirium management protocols.
This real world evaluation revealed that non-medical staff were able to incorporate delirium monitoring into their practice, on the majority of occasions, as part of their daily working routine. Further research is necessary to determine if the routine use of the DEMS can lead to improved understandings and practice of non-medical staff regarding delirium detection.
尽管人们已经意识到谵妄对健康和经济造成的负面影响,但临床实践中仍缺乏对该病症进行常规评估和管理的系统。我们报告了谵妄早期监测系统(DEMS)的开发及初步评估情况,该系统旨在由非医务人员完成,以影响住院环境中的临床流程。基于改良的混乱评估方法(DEMS - CAM)和谵妄观察筛查量表(DEMS - DOSS)描述了两种版本的DEMS。
两种版本的DEMS在一个拥有20张床位的老年精神科病房进行了为期6周的试点。针对病房工作人员进行了关于每种版本DEMS使用方法的培训,并通过电子病历和填写完整的评估表收集数据。主要结果是DEMS的使用模式,次要结果是启动谵妄管理方案。使用χ²检验分析有关DEMS DOSS和DEMS CAMS使用情况的数据。
DEMS CAM和DEMS DOSS的完成率分别为79%和68%。与DEMS - DOSS相比,非医务人员在日常工作中更有可能将DEMS - CAM作为一部分使用(p<0.001)。然而,在触发相关行动方面,如在患者病历中记录评估分数以及实施谵妄管理方案,DEMS - CAM和DEMS - DOSS的使用情况并无差异。
这项实际评估表明,非医务人员在大多数情况下能够将谵妄监测纳入日常工作流程。有必要进行进一步研究,以确定DEMS的常规使用是否能提高非医务人员对谵妄检测的理解和实践水平。