Dollat C, Pierron C, Keslick A, Billoir E, François A, Jarreau P-H
DHU « risques et grossesse », service de médecine et réanimation néonatales de Port-Royal, université Paris Descartes, 53, avenue de l'Observatoire, 75679 Paris, France.
DHU « risques et grossesse », service de médecine et réanimation néonatales de Port-Royal, université Paris Descartes, 53, avenue de l'Observatoire, 75679 Paris, France.
Arch Pediatr. 2016 Sep;23(9):935-43. doi: 10.1016/j.arcped.2016.06.006. Epub 2016 Jul 18.
In France since 2002, the single-donor transfusion protocol, using four pediatric units from the same adult donor's packed red blood cells (PRBCs) in multiply transfused newborns, is recommended in preterm neonates to reduce the risks of infection and alloimmunization. This protocol is controversial, however, because it causes the transfusion of stored blood, which could have adverse consequences. Before the new recommendations of the French Haute Autorité de santé (National authority for health) in 2015, we conducted a national practice survey in 63 neonatal intensive care units (NICU) and a retrospective study of the characteristics of 103 children transfused within our unit, to better target beneficiaries. The practice survey showed that 30 % of French NICUs no longer used the protocol in 2014, due to logistical or financial problems, or concerns about the transfusion of stored blood. The practices were heterogeneous. Few NICUs used a written protocol. In our NICU, the use of single-donor protocol involved the use of units stored for more than 20 days in half of the cases beginning with the third unit used. Six-term newborns were mainly transfused once, which does not seem to warrant the single-donor transfusion protocol. The use of this protocol caused the loss of 50 % of the manufactured units, which go unused. In multivariate analysis, two factors were predictive of multiple transfusion within our population of 95 premature neonates undergoing transfusion: low-term and a high Clinical Risk Index for Babies (CRIB) score. The risk of multiple transfusions would be reduced by about 15 % for each additional week of gestation and approximately 16 % per point within the CRIB score. These variables integrated into a statistical model predict the risk of multiplying transfusions. According to the ROC curve, a calculated risk higher than 50 % is the appropriate cut-off value to transfuse with the single-donor transfusion protocol. This would limit its indications, saving more than 130 pediatric units of blood for 100 transfused children. A prospective study in our department will allow internal validation of this test.
自2002年起,法国推荐在早产新生儿中采用单供体输血方案,即对多次输血的新生儿使用来自同一成年供体的4个儿科单位的浓缩红细胞(PRBCs),以降低感染和同种免疫的风险。然而,该方案存在争议,因为它会导致输注储存血液,这可能会产生不良后果。在法国卫生高级管理局(国家卫生管理机构)2015年发布新建议之前,我们在63个新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)进行了一项全国性实践调查,并对我们科室接受输血的103名儿童的特征进行了回顾性研究,以更好地确定受益对象。实践调查显示,由于后勤或财务问题,或对输注储存血液的担忧,2014年30%的法国新生儿重症监护病房不再使用该方案。实践情况各不相同。很少有新生儿重症监护病房使用书面方案。在我们的新生儿重症监护病房,使用单供体方案时,从使用的第三个单位开始,半数情况下使用储存超过20天的单位。足月儿新生儿主要输血一次,这似乎不需要采用单供体输血方案。使用该方案导致50%的制备单位未被使用而损失。在多变量分析中,在我们接受输血的95名早产儿群体中,两个因素可预测多次输血:孕周小和婴儿临床风险指数(CRIB)评分高。孕周每增加一周,多次输血的风险将降低约15%,CRIB评分每增加一分,风险降低约16%。这些变量纳入统计模型可预测多次输血的风险。根据ROC曲线,计算出的风险高于50%是采用单供体输血方案进行输血的合适临界值。这将限制其适用范围,为100名接受输血的儿童节省超过130个儿科单位的血液。我们科室的一项前瞻性研究将对该检测进行内部验证。