Suppr超能文献

血氧水平依赖(BOLD)信号对视觉皮层扩散张量功能磁共振成像激活的影响。

Influence of BOLD Contributions to Diffusion fMRI Activation of the Visual Cortex.

作者信息

Williams Rebecca J, Reutens David C, Hocking Julia

机构信息

Hotchkiss Brain Institute and Department of Radiology, University of CalgaryCalgary, AB, Canada; Centre for Advanced Imaging, The University of QueenslandSt. Lucia, QLD, Australia; Queensland Brain Institute, The University of QueenslandSt. Lucia, QLD, Australia; Centre for Clinical Research, The University of QueenslandBrisbane, QLD, Australia.

Centre for Advanced Imaging, The University of Queensland St. Lucia, QLD, Australia.

出版信息

Front Neurosci. 2016 Jun 28;10:279. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2016.00279. eCollection 2016.

Abstract

Reliance on the hemodynamic response as a surrogate marker of neural activity imposes an intrinsic limit on the spatial specificity of functional MRI. An alternative approach based on diffusion-weighted functional MRI (DfMRI) has been reported as a contrast less reliant on hemodynamic effects, however current evidence suggests that both hemodynamic and unique neural sources contribute to the diffusion signal. Here we compare activation patterns obtained with the standard blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) contrast to DfMRI in order to gain a deeper understanding of how the BOLD proportion contributes to the observable diffusion signal. Both individual and group-level activation patterns obtained with DfMRI and BOLD to a visual field stimulation paradigm were analyzed. At the individual level, the DfMRI contrast showed a strong, positive relationship between the volumes of cortex activated in response to quadrant- and hemi-field visual stimulation. This was not observed in the corresponding BOLD experiment. Overall, the DfMRI response indicated less between-subject variability, with random effects analyses demonstrating higher statistical values at the peak voxel for DfMRI. Furthermore, the spatial extent of the activation was more restricted to the primary visual region for DfMRI than BOLD. However, the diffusion signal was sensitive to the hemodynamic response in a manner dependent on experimental manipulation. It was also limited by its low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), demonstrating lower sensitivity than BOLD. Together these findings both support DfMRI as a contrast that bears a closer spatial relationship to the underlying neural activity than BOLD, and raise important caveats regarding its utilization. Models explaining the DfMRI signal change need to consider the dynamic vascular contributions that may vary with neural activity.

摘要

将血液动力学反应作为神经活动的替代指标,这给功能磁共振成像(fMRI)的空间特异性带来了内在限制。据报道,一种基于扩散加权功能磁共振成像(DfMRI)的替代方法作为一种对比度,对血液动力学效应的依赖较小,然而目前的证据表明,血液动力学和独特的神经源都对扩散信号有贡献。在这里,我们将标准的血氧水平依赖(BOLD)对比度获得的激活模式与DfMRI进行比较,以便更深入地了解BOLD比例如何对可观察到的扩散信号产生影响。我们分析了通过DfMRI和BOLD对视野刺激范式获得的个体和组水平的激活模式。在个体水平上,DfMRI对比度显示,在对象限和半视野视觉刺激的反应中,激活的皮质体积之间存在强烈的正相关关系。在相应的BOLD实验中未观察到这一点。总体而言,DfMRI反应表明个体间变异性较小,随机效应分析表明DfMRI在峰值体素处的统计值更高。此外,与BOLD相比,DfMRI的激活空间范围更局限于初级视觉区域。然而,扩散信号对血液动力学反应敏感,其方式取决于实验操作。它还受到低信噪比(SNR)的限制,显示出比BOLD更低的灵敏度。这些发现共同支持DfMRI作为一种与潜在神经活动具有比BOLD更紧密空间关系的对比度,同时也对其应用提出了重要的注意事项。解释DfMRI信号变化的模型需要考虑可能随神经活动而变化的动态血管贡献。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce83/4923189/d8f4316d1cf1/fnins-10-00279-g0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验