Duan X, Cui Y, Li H, Shi G, Wu B, Liu M, Chang D, Wang T, Kong Y
Department of Thoracic Surgery, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100050, China.
Indian J Cancer. 2015 Dec;52 Suppl 3:E158-63. doi: 10.4103/0019-509X.186564.
Serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and the soluble fragment of cytokeratin 19 (CYFRA 21-1) are supposed to have a prognostic role in patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after surgery, but it has not been used as an adjunct to the tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) staging system to provide therapy options for patients with pathological Stage I NSCLC. This study was designed to investigate the effect of serum levels of CEA and CYFRA 21-1 before and after surgery on the prognosis of patients with Stage I NSCLC.
A retrospective review was performed regarding the medical records and follow-ups of 169 patients with Stage I NSCLC before and after surgery. The patients were divided into three groups based on levels of serum CEA and CYFRA 21-1 before and after surgery: (1) continuously normal-level groups (CEA [NN] and CYFRA 21-1 [NN] groups); (2) declined to normal-level groups (CEA [HN] and CYFRA 21-1 [HN] groups); and (3) continuously high-level groups (CEA [HH] and CYFRA 21-1 [HH] groups). Survival analysis was conducted using the Kaplan-Meier method for each group. The Chi-square or Fisher exact test was employed to compare clinical and pathologic factors at the level of P < 0.05. The prognostic factor was evaluated by the Cox proportional hazards model.
Compared with the continuously normal-level groups, the CEA [HN] group was significantly correlated to tumor size (P = 0.011), and the CYFRA 21-1 [HN] group was significantly correlated to tumor type and pathological TNM in addition to tumor size. Five-year survivals were significantly lower (P = 0.004) in the CEA [HH] group (67.3%) and the CEA [HN] group (86.5%) than in the CEA [NN] group (85.7%) and were significantly lower (P < 0.001) in the CYFRA 21-1 [HH] group (47.2%) and the CYFRA 21-1 [HN] group (70.1%) than in the CYFRA 21-1 [NN] group (90.1%). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that tumor size (21-50 mm), CEA [HH], and CYFRA 21-1 [HH] were independent unfavorable prognostic factors for overall survival (OS), whereas tumor size (21-50 mm), CEA [HH], CYFRA 21-1 [HN], and CYFRA 21-1 [HH] were independent significant prognostic factors for progression-free survival (PFS).
Patients with a persistently high serum CEA or CYFRA 21-1 before and after surgery had shortest OS and PFS. These patients had worst prognosis. Adjuvant chemotherapy was likely to improve survival for these patients.
血清癌胚抗原(CEA)和细胞角蛋白19可溶性片段(CYFRA 21-1)被认为在非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者术后具有预后作用,但尚未被用作肿瘤-淋巴结-转移(TNM)分期系统的辅助手段,为病理I期NSCLC患者提供治疗选择。本研究旨在探讨手术前后血清CEA和CYFRA 21-1水平对I期NSCLC患者预后的影响。
对169例I期NSCLC患者手术前后的病历和随访情况进行回顾性分析。根据手术前后血清CEA和CYFRA 21-1水平将患者分为三组:(1)持续正常水平组(CEA[NN]组和CYFRA 21-1[NN]组);(2)降至正常水平组(CEA[HN]组和CYFRA 21-1[HN]组);(3)持续高水平组(CEA[HH]组和CYFRA 21-1[HH]组)。采用Kaplan-Meier法对每组进行生存分析。采用卡方检验或Fisher精确检验在P<0.05水平比较临床和病理因素。通过Cox比例风险模型评估预后因素。
与持续正常水平组相比,CEA[HN]组与肿瘤大小显著相关(P=0.011),CYFRA 21-1[HN]组除与肿瘤大小相关外,还与肿瘤类型和病理TNM显著相关。CEA[HH]组(67.3%)和CEA[HN]组(86.5%)的5年生存率显著低于CEA[NN]组(85.7%),CYFRA 21-1[HH]组(47.2%)和CYFRA 21-1[HN]组(70.1%)的5年生存率显著低于CYFRA 21-1[NN]组(90.1%)(P<0.001)。多因素分析表明,肿瘤大小(21-50mm)、CEA[HH]和CYFRA 21-1[HH]是总生存(OS)的独立不良预后因素,而肿瘤大小(21-50mm)、CEA[HH]、CYFRA 21-1[HN]和CYFRA 21-1[HH]是无进展生存(PFS)的独立显著预后因素。
手术前后血清CEA或CYFRA 21-1持续高水平的患者OS和PFS最短。这些患者预后最差。辅助化疗可能改善这些患者的生存。