Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München, 81675, Munich, Germany.
Department of Orthopaedic Sports Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München, 81675, Munich, Germany.
J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2017 Nov;105(8):2282-2291. doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.33759. Epub 2016 Jul 27.
Cefuroxime is widely used for antibiotic prophylaxis in orthopedic surgery. However, a recent study indicated a dose-dependent reduction in osteoblast function in vitro. Nevertheless, cell culture might not sufficiently imitate the complex process of bone remodeling. As data concerning possible in vivo interactions of cefuroxime on fracture healing are completely missing, we investigated the following hypothesis: Does Cefuroxime impair bone healing in vivo? Therefore, 34 male Wistar rats were randomised to cefuroxime-treated or control groups, a Kirschner wire was inserted into right femora and closed transverse fractures were produced. Twenty-one days later, the structural properties of the fracture callus in the early fracture healing phase were evaluated via a combination of micro-CT (μCT), biomechanics and histology. µCT demonstrated similar values in the cefuroxime and control group (e.g., callus volume: 67.19 ± 14.90 mm vs. 55.35 ± 6.74 mm , p = 0.12; density: 635.48 ± 14.81 mg HA/cm vs. 647.87 ± 13.01 mg HA/cm , p = 0.16). Biomechanically, similar values were again determined between the groups, in terms of both maximum load (77.65 ± 41.82 vs. 78.54 ± 20.52, p = 0.95) and stiffness (122.44 ± 81.16 vs. 123.74 ± 60.08, p = 0.97). Histological findings were consistent with the radiographic results. Thus, no relevant differences between the cefuroxime and control groups could be found and the reported negative effects on osteoblasts in vitro were not confirmed in vivo by using standard concentrations of cefuroxime. In conclusion, cefuroxime can reasonably be recommended in a clinical setting as an antibiotic therapy when fracture healing is involved. However, supraphysiological doses were not evaluated, which may be present when cefuroxime is used as an additive to bone cement and released over time. Therefore, future studies should evaluate the in vivo effects of prolonged high cefuroxime doses on implant incorporation. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater, 105B: 2282-2291, 2017.
头孢呋辛被广泛用于骨科手术中的抗生素预防。然而,最近的一项研究表明,它在体外具有剂量依赖性的成骨细胞功能降低。然而,细胞培养可能无法充分模拟骨重建的复杂过程。由于关于头孢呋辛在体内对骨折愈合的可能相互作用的资料完全缺失,我们研究了以下假设:头孢呋辛是否会损害体内的骨折愈合?因此,34 只雄性 Wistar 大鼠被随机分为头孢呋辛处理组或对照组,右股骨插入克氏针,制作闭合性横断骨折。21 天后,通过 micro-CT(μCT)、生物力学和组织学的组合,评估早期骨折愈合阶段的骨折痂的结构特性。μCT 显示头孢呋辛组和对照组的数值相似(例如,骨痂体积:67.19±14.90mm 与 55.35±6.74mm,p=0.12;密度:635.48±14.81mgHA/cm 与 647.87±13.01mgHA/cm,p=0.16)。生物力学上,两组之间也再次确定了相似的数值,无论是最大载荷(77.65±41.82 与 78.54±20.52,p=0.95)还是刚度(122.44±81.16 与 123.74±60.08,p=0.97)。组织学发现与影像学结果一致。因此,头孢呋辛组和对照组之间没有发现明显的差异,并且在使用标准浓度的头孢呋辛时,体外报道的对成骨细胞的负面影响在体内没有得到证实。总之,当涉及骨折愈合时,头孢呋辛可以合理地作为一种抗生素治疗药物在临床中推荐使用。然而,没有评估超生理剂量,当头孢呋辛作为骨水泥的添加剂并随时间释放时可能存在超生理剂量。因此,未来的研究应该评估长期高剂量头孢呋辛对植入物结合的体内影响。2016 年 Wiley 期刊,生物医学材料研究杂志 B 部分:应用生物材料,105B:2282-2291,2017。