Glenn Ian C, Bruns Nicholas E, Ponsky Todd A
Division of Pediatric Surgery, Akron Children's Hospital , Akron, Ohio.
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2016 Oct;26(10):840-844. doi: 10.1089/lap.2016.0226. Epub 2016 Jul 27.
While adult bowel anastomoses are typically performed with staplers, neonatal small bowel anastomoses have traditionally been performed in a hand-sewn manner due to the large size of surgical staplers. The purpose of this study was to compare stapled anastomosis using a newly available, 5-mm laparoscopic stapler to a hand-sewn anastomosis in an open animal model.
Twenty anastomoses were performed by two general surgery residents (10 stapled and 10 hand-sewn) in an adult New Zealand white rabbit. The small bowel was divided with a scalpel. Surgical technique was alternated between single-layer hand-sewn and stapled anastomoses. Each anastomosis was resected for ex vivo testing. Measurements collected were outer diameter of the bowel before division, time to perform the anastomosis, anastomosis inner diameter (ID), and leak test. IDs were measured by cutting the anastomosis in cross-section, taking a photograph, and measuring the diameter by computer software. In addition, the surgeons qualitatively evaluated the anastomoses for hemostasis and overall quality. Statistical significance was determined using the Student's t-test.
There were statistically significant differences between stapled and hand-sewn anastomosis, respectively, for average operative time (4 minutes 2 seconds versus 16 minutes 6 seconds, P < .01) and anastomosis ID (8.2 versus 3.7 mm, P < .01). There was one leak in the stapled group, which occurred at overlapping staple lines closing the enterotomy. A second stapled anastomosis required suture reinforcement, again at the enterotomy closure, due to operator error. Starting diameter, leak rate, hemostasis, and anastomosis quality were not statistically significant.
In a neonatal open animal model, a 5-mm stapled anastomosis is an acceptable alternative to hand-sewn small bowel anastomosis. The stapler is faster and creates a larger diameter anastomosis, however, there was one leak when closing the enterotomy in the stapled group and overlapping staple lines should be avoided.
虽然成人肠道吻合术通常使用吻合器进行,但由于手术吻合器尺寸较大,新生儿小肠吻合术传统上一直采用手工缝合的方式。本研究的目的是在开放动物模型中,将一种新上市的5毫米腹腔镜吻合器进行的吻合术与手工缝合吻合术进行比较。
两名普通外科住院医师在成年新西兰白兔身上进行了20次吻合术(10次吻合器吻合和10次手工缝合)。用手术刀将小肠切断。手术技术在单层手工缝合和吻合器吻合之间交替进行。每次吻合术后均进行切除以进行体外测试。收集的测量指标包括切断前肠管的外径、吻合操作时间、吻合口内径(ID)和渗漏测试。通过将吻合口切成横截面、拍照并使用计算机软件测量直径来测量内径。此外,外科医生对吻合口的止血情况和整体质量进行了定性评估。采用学生t检验确定统计学意义。
吻合器吻合和手工缝合吻合在平均手术时间(4分2秒对16分6秒,P<0.01)和吻合口内径(8.2对3.7毫米,P<0.01)方面分别存在统计学显著差异。吻合器组有1例渗漏,发生在关闭肠切开处的钉合线重叠处。由于操作人员失误,第二次吻合器吻合在肠切开处关闭时再次需要缝线加固。起始直径、渗漏率、止血情况和吻合质量无统计学显著差异。
在新生儿开放动物模型中,5毫米吻合器吻合是手工缝合小肠吻合术的一种可接受的替代方法。吻合器速度更快,能形成更大直径的吻合口,然而,吻合器组在关闭肠切开处时有1例渗漏,应避免钉合线重叠。