McVicar Andrew, Greenwood Christina, Ellis Carol, LeForis Chantelle
1 Faculty of Health, Social Care and Education, Anglia Ruskin University , Chelmsford, United Kingdom .
2 Faculty of Medical Sciences, Anglia Ruskin University , Chelmsford, United Kingdom .
J Altern Complement Med. 2016 Sep;22(9):739-50. doi: 10.1089/acm.2016.0015. Epub 2016 Jul 27.
Interpretation of the efficacy of reflexology is hindered by inconsistent research designs and complicated by professional views that criteria of randomized controlled trials (RCTs)are not ideal to research holistic complementary and alternative medicine practice. The influence of research designs on study outcomes is not known. This integrative review sought to evaluate this possibility.
Thirty-seven interventional studies (2000-2014) were identified; they had RCT or non-RCT design and compared reflexology outcomes against a control/comparison group. Viability of integrating RCT and non-RCT studies into a single database was first evaluated by appraisal of 16 reporting fields related to study setting and objectives, sample demographics, methodologic design, and treatment fidelity and assessment against Jadad score quality criteria for RCTs. For appraisal, the database was stratified into RCT/non-RCT or Jadad score of 3 or more or less than 3. Deficits in reporting were identified for blind assignment of participants, dropout/completion rate, and School of Reflexology. For comparison purposes, these fields were excluded from subsequent analysis for evidence of association between design fields and of fields with study outcomes.
Thirty-one studies applied psychometric tools and 20 applied biometric tools (14 applied both). A total of 116 measures were used. Type of measure was associated with study objectives (p < 0.001; chi-square), in particular of psychometric measures with a collated "behavioral/cognitive" objective. Significant outcomes were more likely (p < 0.001; chi-square) for psychometric than for biometric measures. Neither type of outcome was associated with choice of RCT or non-RCT method, but psychometric responses were associated (p = 0.007) with a nonmassage control strategy.
The review supports psychometric responses to reflexology when study design uses a nonmassage control strategy. Findings suggest that an evaluation of outcomes against sham reflexology massage and other forms of massage, as well as a narrower focus of study objective, may clarify whether there is a relationship between study design and efficacy of reflexology.
反射疗法疗效的解读因研究设计不一致而受阻,同时专业观点认为随机对照试验(RCT)的标准并不适合研究整体补充和替代医学实践,这使得情况变得更加复杂。研究设计对研究结果的影响尚不清楚。本整合性综述旨在评估这种可能性。
共识别出37项干预性研究(2000 - 2014年);这些研究采用了RCT或非RCT设计,并将反射疗法的结果与对照组/比较组进行比较。首先通过评估与研究背景和目标、样本人口统计学、方法设计、治疗保真度相关的16个报告领域,并根据RCT的Jadad评分质量标准进行评估,来评估将RCT和非RCT研究整合到单个数据库的可行性。为了进行评估,数据库被分层为RCT/非RCT或Jadad评分为3分及以上或低于3分。在参与者的盲法分配、退出/完成率和反射疗法学校方面发现了报告缺陷。为了进行比较,在后续分析中排除这些领域,以寻找设计领域与研究结果之间的关联证据。
31项研究应用了心理测量工具,20项应用了生物测量工具(14项同时应用了两者)。总共使用了116种测量方法。测量类型与研究目标相关(p < 0.001;卡方检验),特别是心理测量方法与整理后的“行为/认知”目标相关。心理测量方法比生物测量方法更有可能产生显著结果(p < 0.001;卡方检验)。两种结果类型均与RCT或非RCT方法的选择无关,但心理测量反应与非按摩对照策略相关(p = 0.007)。
当研究设计采用非按摩对照策略时,该综述支持对反射疗法的心理测量反应。研究结果表明,针对假反射疗法按摩和其他形式的按摩评估结果,以及更狭窄地聚焦研究目标,可能会阐明研究设计与反射疗法疗效之间是否存在关系。