Haupt G, Haupt A, Donovan J M, Drach G W, Chaussy C
Department of Surgery, University of Arizona Health Sciences Center, Tucson.
J Urol. 1989 Aug;142(2 Pt 1):259-62. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)38724-4.
Since the inception of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy 9 years ago treatment strategies have changed. Patients currently are receiving larger numbers of higher voltage shock waves. However, upper limits of safety for these treatments have not been established. In an attempt to address this question a comparative study of effects of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy on laboratory values between 2 stone centers, Munich and Tucson, using different treatment strategies 3 to 4 years apart was done to identify possible differing effects. Patient stone burdens were similar. However, Tucson patients received almost twice the number of shock waves. Both groups showed a significant decrease in hematocrit (by 8.7 per cent in Munich and 6.4 per cent in Tucson). Both groups had a significant increase in white blood count (14.5 per cent in Munich and 22.7 per cent in Tucson). In addition, both groups had increased serum levels of glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase of 43.3 and 59.7 per cent, respectively. However, only the Tucson group showed increases in serum glutamic pyruvic transaminase, lactic dehydrogenase and total bilirubin in 51.5, 40.8 and 46 per cent of the patients, respectively. Further analysis indicated that extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy was associated with 2 significant short-term changes of blood or serum laboratory values: 1) those presumed to be dilutional from related infusions, rather than extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy treatments themselves and 2) those presumed to be related to cellular injury after high energy treatments. Elevated serum glutamic pyruvic transaminase, lactic dehydrogenase and total bilirubin values of Tucson patients clearly were related to higher kilovolts and number of shocks or to treatments on the right side.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
自9年前体外冲击波碎石术问世以来,治疗策略已发生变化。目前患者接受的高电压冲击波数量更多。然而,这些治疗的安全上限尚未确定。为了解决这个问题,对慕尼黑和图森两个结石中心采用间隔3至4年的不同治疗策略进行体外冲击波碎石术对实验室指标影响的比较研究,以确定可能存在的不同影响。患者的结石负荷相似。然而,图森的患者接受的冲击波数量几乎是慕尼黑患者的两倍。两组患者的血细胞比容均显著下降(慕尼黑下降8.7%,图森下降6.4%)。两组患者的白细胞计数均显著升高(慕尼黑升高14.5%,图森升高22.7%)。此外,两组患者血清谷草转氨酶水平分别升高43.3%和59.7%。然而,只有图森组分别有51.5%、40.8%和46%的患者血清谷丙转氨酶、乳酸脱氢酶和总胆红素升高。进一步分析表明,体外冲击波碎石术与血液或血清实验室指标的两个显著短期变化有关:1)那些被认为是相关输液引起的稀释性变化,而非体外冲击波碎石术本身导致的变化;2)那些被认为与高能治疗后的细胞损伤有关的变化。图森患者血清谷丙转氨酶、乳酸脱氢酶和总胆红素升高显然与更高的千伏数和冲击波数量或右侧治疗有关。(摘要截选至250词)