Wente Sarah, Schröder Simone, Buckard Johannes, Büttel Hans-Martin, von Deimling Florian, Diener Wilfried, Häussler Martin, Hübschle Susanne, Kinder Silvia, Kurlemann Gerhard, Kretzschmar Christoph, Lingen Michael, Maroske Wiebke, Mundt Dirk, Sánchez-Albisua Iciar, Seeger Jürgen, Toelle Sandra P, Boltshauser Eugen, Brockmann Knut
Interdisciplinary Pediatric Center for Children with Developmental Disabilities and Severe Chronic Disorders, Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, University Medical Center, Robert Koch Str. 40, 37075, Göttingen, Germany.
Sozialpädiatrisches Zentrum, Evangelisches Krankenhaus, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2016 Jul 29;11(1):104. doi: 10.1186/s13023-016-0486-z.
The nosological assignment of congenital ocular motor apraxia type Cogan (COMA) is still controversial. While regarded as a distinct entity by some authorities including the Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man catalog of genetic disorders, others consider COMA merely a clinical symptom.
We performed a retrospective multicenter data collection study with re-evaluation of clinical and neuroimaging data of 21 previously unreported patients (8 female, 13 male, ages ranging from 2 to 24 years) diagnosed as having COMA.
Ocular motor apraxia (OMA) was recognized during the first year of life and confined to horizontal pursuit in all patients. OMA attenuated over the years in most cases, regressed completely in two siblings, and persisted unimproved in one individual. Accompanying clinical features included early onset ataxia in most patients and cognitive impairment with learning disability (n = 6) or intellectual disability (n = 4). Re-evaluation of MRI data sets revealed a hitherto unrecognized molar tooth sign diagnostic for Joubert syndrome in 11 patients, neuroimaging features of Poretti-Boltshauser syndrome in one case and cerebral malformation suspicious of a tubulinopathy in another subject. In the remainder, MRI showed vermian hypo-/dysplasia in 4 and no abnormalities in another 4 patients. There was a strong trend to more severe cognitive impairment in patients with Joubert syndrome compared to those with inconclusive MRI, but otherwise no significant difference in clinical phenotypes between these two groups.
Systematical renewed analysis of neuroimaging data resulted in a diagnostic reappraisal in the majority of patients with early-onset OMA in the cohort reported here. This finding poses a further challenge to the notion of COMA constituting a separate entity and underlines the need for an expert assessment of neuroimaging in children with COMA, especially if they show cognitive impairment.
科根型先天性眼球运动失用症(COMA)的疾病分类仍存在争议。一些权威机构(包括《人类孟德尔遗传在线》遗传疾病目录)将其视为一种独特的疾病实体,而另一些人则认为COMA仅仅是一种临床症状。
我们进行了一项回顾性多中心数据收集研究,对21例先前未报告的被诊断为COMA的患者(8例女性,13例男性,年龄在2至24岁之间)的临床和神经影像数据进行了重新评估。
所有患者在出生后第一年内均被诊断出眼球运动失用症(OMA),且仅限于水平追踪。多年来,大多数病例中的OMA症状有所减轻,两名同胞完全消退,一名患者持续未改善。伴随的临床特征包括大多数患者早期出现共济失调,以及认知障碍伴学习障碍(n = 6)或智力障碍(n = 4)。对MRI数据集的重新评估显示,11例患者出现了此前未被识别的、对Joubert综合征具有诊断意义的磨牙征,1例患者具有Poretti-Boltshauser综合征的神经影像特征,另1例患者存在疑似微管病变的脑畸形。其余患者中,4例MRI显示蚓部发育不全/发育异常,4例未发现异常。与MRI结果不明确的患者相比,Joubert综合征患者的认知障碍有更严重的趋势,但两组的临床表型在其他方面无显著差异。
对神经影像数据进行系统的重新分析,导致了本研究队列中大多数早发性OMA患者的诊断重新评估。这一发现对COMA构成一个独立实体的观点提出了进一步挑战,并强调了对COMA患儿进行神经影像专家评估的必要性,特别是当他们出现认知障碍时。