Rosa Isabel M D, Smith Matthew J, Wearn Oliver R, Purves Drew, Ewers Robert M
Imperial College of London, Silwood Park Campus, Buckhurst Road, Ascot SL5 7PY, UK; German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Deutscher Platz 5E, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.
Computational Science Laboratory, Microsoft Research, Cambridge CB1 2FB, UK.
Curr Biol. 2016 Aug 22;26(16):2161-6. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2016.06.013. Epub 2016 Jul 28.
Tropical deforestation has caused a significant share of carbon emissions and species losses, but historical patterns have rarely been explicitly considered when estimating these impacts [1]. A deforestation event today leads to a time-delayed future release of carbon, from the eventual decay either of forest products or of slash left at the site [2]. Similarly, deforestation often does not result in the immediate loss of species, and communities may exhibit a process of "relaxation" to their new equilibrium over time [3]. We used a spatially explicit land cover change model [4] to reconstruct the annual rates and spatial patterns of tropical deforestation that occurred between 1950 and 2009 in the Amazon, in the Congo Basin, and across Southeast Asia. Using these patterns, we estimated the resulting gross vegetation carbon emissions [2, 5] and species losses over time [6]. Importantly, we accounted for the time lags inherent in both the release of carbon and the extinction of species. We show that even if deforestation had completely halted in 2010, time lags ensured there would still be a carbon emissions debt of at least 8.6 petagrams, equivalent to 5-10 years of global deforestation, and an extinction debt of more than 140 bird, mammal, and amphibian forest-specific species, which if paid, would increase the number of 20(th)-century extinctions in these groups by 120%. Given the magnitude of these debts, commitments to reduce emissions and biodiversity loss are unlikely to be realized without specific actions that directly address this damaging environmental legacy.
热带森林砍伐造成了相当一部分碳排放和物种损失,但在估算这些影响时,历史模式很少被明确考虑在内[1]。如今的一次森林砍伐事件会导致未来碳的延迟释放,这源于林产品或留在原地的砍伐剩余物最终的腐烂[2]。同样,森林砍伐往往不会导致物种立即消失,随着时间推移,群落可能会呈现出一个向新平衡“弛豫”的过程[3]。我们使用了一个空间明确的土地覆盖变化模型[4]来重建1950年至2009年期间在亚马逊地区、刚果盆地以及整个东南亚发生的热带森林砍伐的年速率和空间模式。利用这些模式,我们估算了由此产生的总植被碳排放量[2, 5]以及随时间推移的物种损失[6]。重要的是,我们考虑了碳释放和物种灭绝中固有的时间滞后。我们表明,即使森林砍伐在2010年完全停止,时间滞后仍确保至少存在8.6拍克的碳排放债务,相当于全球森林砍伐量的5至10年,以及超过140种鸟类、哺乳动物和两栖动物森林特有物种的灭绝债务,如果偿还这些债务,将使这些类群在20世纪的灭绝数量增加120%。鉴于这些债务的规模,如果不采取直接解决这一破坏性环境遗产的具体行动,减少排放和生物多样性损失的承诺不太可能实现。