Sterns Richard H
University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester General Hospital , 1425 Portland Avenue, Rochester, NY 14534 , USA.
Clin Kidney J. 2016 Aug;9(4):527-9. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfw050. Epub 2016 Jun 19.
A variety of formulas have been proposed to predict changes in serum sodium concentration. All are based on an experiment done over 50 years ago by Edelman, who derived a formula relating the plasma sodium concentration to isotopically measured body sodium, potassium, and water. Some of these formulas fail because they do not include urinary losses of electrolytes and water. Even those that include these essential variables are not accurate enough for clinical use because it is impractical to adjust calculations to rapid changes in urinary composition, and because the formulas do not account for changes in serum sodium caused by internal exchanges between soluble and bound sodium stores or shifts of water into or out of cells resulting from changes in intracellular organic osmolytes. Nephrologists should curb their enthusiasm for predictive formulas and rely instead on frequent measurements of the serum sodium when correcting hyponatremia and hypernatremia.
已经提出了多种公式来预测血清钠浓度的变化。所有这些公式都是基于50多年前埃德尔曼所做的一项实验,他推导出了一个将血浆钠浓度与同位素测量的体内钠、钾和水相关联的公式。其中一些公式之所以失败,是因为它们没有包括电解质和水的尿丢失量。即使是那些包含这些重要变量的公式,对于临床应用来说也不够准确,因为根据尿液成分的快速变化来调整计算是不切实际的,而且这些公式没有考虑到可溶性和结合性钠储备之间的内部交换或细胞内有机渗透质变化导致的水进出细胞所引起的血清钠变化。肾病学家在纠正低钠血症和高钠血症时,应抑制对预测公式的热情,而应依靠频繁测量血清钠。