Suppr超能文献

德国的效益评估:对价格折扣的影响

Benefit assessment in Germany: implications for price discounts.

作者信息

Theidel Ulrike, von der Schulenburg J-Matthias Graf

机构信息

Xcenda GmbH, Lange Laube 31, 30159, Hannover, Germany.

Center for Health Economics Research Hannover (CHERH), Leibniz Universität Hannover, Otto-Brenner-Straße 1, 30159, Hannover, Germany.

出版信息

Health Econ Rev. 2016 Dec;6(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s13561-016-0109-3. Epub 2016 Aug 2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The AMNOG regulation, introduced in 2011 in Germany, changed the game for new drugs. Now, the industry is required to submit a dossier to the GBA (the central decision body in the German sickness fund system) to show additional benefit. After granting the magnitude of the additional benefit by the GBA, the manufacturer is entitled to negotiate the reimbursement price with the GKV-SV (National Association of Statutory Health Insurance Funds). The reimbursement price is defined as a discount on the drug price at launch. As the price or discount negotiations between the manufacturers and the GKV-SV takes place behind closed doors, the factors influencing the results of the negotiation are not known.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this evaluation is to identify factors influencing the results of the AMNOG price negotiation process.

METHODS

The analysis was based on a dataset containing detailed information on all assessments until the end of 2015. A descriptive analysis was followed by an econometric analysis of various potential factors (benefit rating, size of target population, deviating from appropriate comparative therapy and incorporation of HRQoL-data).

RESULTS

Until December 2015, manufacturers and the GKV-SV finalized 96 negotiations in 193 therapeutic areas, based on assessment conducted by the GBA. The GBA has granted an additional benefit to 100/193 drug innovations. Negotiated discount was significantly higher for those drugs without additional benefit (p = 0.030) and non-orphan drugs (p = 0.015). Smaller population size, no deviation from recommended appropriate comparative therapy and the incorporation of HRQoL-data were associated with a lower discount on the price at launch. However, neither a uni- nor the multivariate linear regression showed enough power to predict the final discount.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the AMNOG regulation implemented binding and strict rules for the benefit assessment itself, the outcome of the discount negotiations are still unpredictable. Obviously, negotiation tactics, the current political situation and soft factors seem to play a more influential role for the outcome of the negotiations than the five hard and known factors analyzed in this study. Further research is needed to evaluate additional factors.

摘要

背景

2011年在德国实施的《德国药品市场改革法案》(AMNOG)改变了新药的竞争格局。如今,制药行业需要向德国医疗卫生中央委员会(GBA,德国疾病基金系统的中央决策机构)提交一份档案,以证明新药的额外益处。在GBA确定了额外益处的程度后,制造商有权与德国法定医疗保险基金协会(GKV-SV)协商报销价格。报销价格被定义为药品上市价格的折扣。由于制造商与GKV-SV之间的价格或折扣谈判是在闭门情况下进行的,因此影响谈判结果的因素尚不清楚。

目的

本评估的目的是确定影响AMNOG价格谈判过程结果的因素。

方法

分析基于一个数据集,该数据集包含截至2015年底所有评估的详细信息。在进行描述性分析之后,对各种潜在因素(益处评级、目标人群规模、偏离适当的对照疗法以及纳入健康相关生活质量数据)进行计量经济学分析。

结果

截至2015年12月,基于GBA的评估,制造商和GKV-SV在193个治疗领域完成了96次谈判。GBA已对193种药物创新中的100种给予了额外益处。对于那些没有额外益处的药物(p = 0.030)和非孤儿药(p = 0.015),协商的折扣明显更高。较小的人群规模、未偏离推荐的适当对照疗法以及纳入健康相关生活质量数据与上市时较低的价格折扣相关。然而,单变量和多变量线性回归均未显示出足够的能力来预测最终折扣。

结论

尽管AMNOG法规对益处评估本身实施了具有约束力的严格规则,但折扣谈判的结果仍然不可预测。显然,谈判策略、当前的政治形势和软性因素似乎对谈判结果的影响比本研究中分析的五个硬性且已知的因素更大。需要进一步研究以评估其他因素。

相似文献

1
Benefit assessment in Germany: implications for price discounts.
Health Econ Rev. 2016 Dec;6(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s13561-016-0109-3. Epub 2016 Aug 2.
2
[Benefit Assessment and Price Negotiation Under AMNOG: Calculable Process or Unfair Poker Game?].
Gesundheitswesen. 2018 Jun;80(6):573-579. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-113600. Epub 2016 Sep 16.
3
From Indication-Based Pricing to Blended Approach: Evidence on the Price and Reimbursement Negotiation in Italy.
Pharmacoecon Open. 2024 Mar;8(2):251-261. doi: 10.1007/s41669-023-00467-2. Epub 2024 Jan 16.
4
Lessons From The Impact Of Price Regulation On The Pricing Of Anticancer Drugs In Germany.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2020 Jul;39(7):1185-1193. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2019.01122.
5
Structural changes in the German pharmaceutical market: price setting mechanisms based on the early benefit evaluation.
Health Policy. 2013 Mar;109(3):263-9. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2012.12.005. Epub 2013 Jan 20.
6
Early benefit assessment of new drugs in Germany - results from 2011 to 2012.
Health Policy. 2014 Jun;116(2-3):147-53. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2013.12.008. Epub 2014 Jan 8.
8
Ten years of German benefit assessment: price analysis for drugs with unproven additional benefit.
Health Econ Policy Law. 2024 Apr;19(2):216-233. doi: 10.1017/S1744133123000117. Epub 2023 Aug 14.
10
Price benchmarks of drugs selected for Medicare price negotiation and their therapeutic alternatives.
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2024 Aug;30(8):762-772. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2024.24153. Epub 2024 Jun 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Drivers of innovation value: simulation for new drug pricing evaluation based on system dynamics modelling.
Front Pharmacol. 2025 Jan 22;16:1474856. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1474856. eCollection 2025.
3
HTA decision-making for drugs for rare diseases: comparison of processes across countries.
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2022 Jul 8;17(1):258. doi: 10.1186/s13023-022-02397-4.
4
The Assessment of the Innovativeness of a New Medicine in Italy.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Dec 8;8:793640. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.793640. eCollection 2021.
5
Health Technology Assessment of Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products: Comparison Among 3 European Countries.
Front Pharmacol. 2021 Oct 8;12:755052. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.755052. eCollection 2021.
9
Determinants of Orphan Drug Prices in Germany.
Pharmacoeconomics. 2020 Apr;38(4):397-411. doi: 10.1007/s40273-019-00872-8.
10

本文引用的文献

1
[The German Pharmaceutical Market Reorganization Act (AMNOG) from an economic point of view].
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2015 Mar;58(3):291-7. doi: 10.1007/s00103-014-2116-z.
2
Re: "Early benefit assessment of new drugs in Germany--results from 2011 to 2012" [Health Policy 116 (2-3) (2014) 147-153].
Health Policy. 2014 Nov;118(2):271. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2014.10.009. Epub 2014 Oct 22.
3
Analysis of endpoints used in marketing authorisations versus value assessments of oncology medicines in Germany.
Health Policy. 2014 Nov;118(2):242-54. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2014.08.004. Epub 2014 Aug 24.
4
Early benefit assessment of pharmaceuticals in Germany: manufacturers' expectations versus the Federal Joint Committee's decisions.
Med Decis Making. 2014 Nov;34(8):1030-47. doi: 10.1177/0272989X14546377. Epub 2014 Aug 22.
6
Early benefit assessment of new drugs in Germany - results from 2011 to 2012.
Health Policy. 2014 Jun;116(2-3):147-53. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2013.12.008. Epub 2014 Jan 8.
7
[The costs of new drugs compared to current standard treatment].
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2013;107(7):461-7. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2013.04.031. Epub 2013 May 31.
8
Early benefit assessment (EBA) in Germany: analysing decisions 18 months after introducing the new AMNOG legislation.
Eur J Health Econ. 2014 Jul;15(6):577-89. doi: 10.1007/s10198-013-0495-y. Epub 2013 Jun 16.
9
Structural changes in the German pharmaceutical market: price setting mechanisms based on the early benefit evaluation.
Health Policy. 2013 Mar;109(3):263-9. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2012.12.005. Epub 2013 Jan 20.
10
Separating the wheat from the chaff.
Eur J Health Econ. 2012 Apr;13(2):121-6. doi: 10.1007/s10198-011-0375-2.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验