Rubio Marie T, Savani Bipin N, Labopin Myriam, Polge Emmanuelle, Niederwieser Dietger, Ganser Arnold, Schwerdtfeger Rainer, Ehninger Gerhard, Finke Jürgen, Renate Arnold, Craddock Charles, Kröger Nicolaus, Hallek Michael, Jindra Pavel, Mohty Mohamad, Nagler Arnon
Department of Hematology, Hôpital Brabois, CHRU Nancy, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France.
CNRS UMR 7365, IMoPA, Nancy, France.
J Hematol Oncol. 2016 Aug 3;9(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s13045-016-0295-9.
Data comparing fully matched and mismatched-unrelated-donor (M- and mM-URD) allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (allo-SCT) following reduced intensity conditioning regimens for acute myeloid leukemia are limited.
We retrospectively compared the outcome of 3398 patients above the age of 50 years who underwent 10/10 M-URD (n = 2567), 9/10 (n = 723), or 8/10 (n = 108) mM-URD allo-SCT for acute myeloid leukemia after reduced intensity conditioning regimen between 2000 and 2013. The Kaplan-Meier estimator, the cumulative incidence function, and Cox proportional hazards regression models were used where appropriate.
HLA matching had no impact on engraftment (p = 0.31). In univariate analysis, in comparison to 10/10 M-URD, mM-URD was associated with higher incidence of grade II-IV acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) (p = 0.0002), similar rates of chronic GVHD (p = 0.138) but increased incidence of its extensive form (p = 0.047). Compared to 10/10 M-URD, patients transplanted in the first complete remission (CR1) with a 9 or an 8/10 mM-URD had decreased 2-year leukemia free (LFS) (p = 0.005) and overall survivals (OS) (56.7, 46.1, and 50.2 %, respectively, p = 0.005), while outcomes were comparable between all groups for patients transplanted beyond CR1. In multivariate analysis, 9/10 versus 10/10 URD was associated with higher non-relapse mortality (HR 1.34, p = 0.001), similar risk of relapse and chronic GVHD and inferior LFS (HR 1.25, p = 0.0001), and OS (HR 1.27, p = 0.0001). There was no difference in adjusted transplant outcomes between 9/10 and 8/10 mM-URD.
Reduced intensity conditioned allo-SCT with a 10/10 M-URD remains the preferable option for AML patients above the age of 50 years. The use of a 9/10 or an 8/10 mM-URD in patients not having a fully matched donor represents an alternative therapeutic option that should be compared to other alternative donor transplant strategies.
关于急性髓系白血病患者在接受降低强度预处理方案后,完全匹配和错配无关供者(M-URD和mM-URD)异体造血干细胞移植(allo-SCT)的比较数据有限。
我们回顾性比较了2000年至2013年间接受10/10 M-URD(n = 2567)、9/10(n = 723)或8/10(n = 108)mM-URD allo-SCT治疗急性髓系白血病的3398例50岁以上患者的结局。在适当情况下使用了Kaplan-Meier估计器、累积发病率函数和Cox比例风险回归模型。
HLA匹配对植入无影响(p = 0.31)。在单因素分析中,与10/10 M-URD相比,mM-URD与II-IV级急性移植物抗宿主病(GVHD)的较高发生率相关(p = 0.0002),慢性GVHD发生率相似(p = 0.138),但其广泛形式的发生率增加(p = 0.047)。与10/10 M-URD相比,在首次完全缓解(CR1)时接受9/10或8/10 mM-URD移植的患者2年无白血病生存率(LFS)降低(p = 0.005),总生存率(OS)也降低(分别为56.7%、46.1%和50.2%,p = 0.005),而CR1之后移植的患者在所有组之间的结局相当。在多因素分析中,9/10与10/10 URD相比与较高的非复发死亡率相关(HR 1.34,p = 0.001),复发和慢性GVHD风险相似,但LFS较差(HR 1.25,p = 0.0001),OS也较差(HR 1.27,p = 0.0001)。9/10和8/10 mM-URD之间的调整后移植结局无差异。
对于50岁以上的急性髓系白血病患者,采用10/10 M-URD进行降低强度预处理的allo-SCT仍然是首选方案。对于没有完全匹配供者的患者,使用9/10或8/10 mM-URD是一种替代治疗选择,应与其他替代供者移植策略进行比较。