Kersten J A F, Booth George H, Alavi Ali
University Chemical Laboratory, Lensfield Road, Cambridge CB2 1EW, United Kingdom.
Department of Physics, King's College London, Strand, London WC2R 2LS, United Kingdom.
J Chem Phys. 2016 Aug 7;145(5):054117. doi: 10.1063/1.4959245.
The Full Configuration Interaction Quantum Monte Carlo (FCIQMC) method has proved able to provide near-exact solutions to the electronic Schrödinger equation within a finite orbital basis set, without relying on an expansion about a reference state. However, a drawback to the approach is that being based on an expansion of Slater determinants, the FCIQMC method suffers from a basis set incompleteness error that decays very slowly with the size of the employed single particle basis. The FCIQMC results obtained in a small basis set can be improved significantly with explicitly correlated techniques. Here, we present a study that assesses and compares two contrasting "universal" explicitly correlated approaches that fit into the FCIQMC framework: the [2]R12 method of Kong and Valeev [J. Chem. Phys. 135, 214105 (2011)] and the explicitly correlated canonical transcorrelation approach of Yanai and Shiozaki [J. Chem. Phys. 136, 084107 (2012)]. The former is an a posteriori internally contracted perturbative approach, while the latter transforms the Hamiltonian prior to the FCIQMC simulation. These comparisons are made across the 55 molecules of the G1 standard set. We found that both methods consistently reduce the basis set incompleteness, for accurate atomization energies in small basis sets, reducing the error from 28 mEh to 3-4 mEh. While many of the conclusions hold in general for any combination of multireference approaches with these methodologies, we also consider FCIQMC-specific advantages of each approach.
全组态相互作用量子蒙特卡罗(FCIQMC)方法已被证明能够在有限的轨道基组内为电子薛定谔方程提供近似精确解,而无需依赖于围绕参考态的展开。然而,该方法的一个缺点是,基于斯莱特行列式的展开,FCIQMC方法存在基组不完备误差,该误差随着所采用的单粒子基组大小的增加而衰减得非常缓慢。在小基组中获得的FCIQMC结果可以通过显式相关技术得到显著改善。在这里,我们展示了一项研究,该研究评估并比较了两种适用于FCIQMC框架的截然不同的“通用”显式相关方法:Kong和Valeev的[2]R12方法[《化学物理杂志》135, 214105 (2011)]以及Yanai和Shiozaki的显式相关正则超相关方法[《化学物理杂志》136, 084107 (2012)]。前者是一种后验内收缩微扰方法,而后者在FCIQMC模拟之前对哈密顿量进行变换。这些比较是针对G1标准集的55个分子进行的。我们发现这两种方法都能持续减少基组不完备性,对于小基组中的精确原子化能,将误差从28 mEh降低到3 - 4 mEh。虽然许多结论对于这些方法与多参考方法的任何组合通常都成立,但我们也考虑了每种方法在FCIQMC方面的特定优势。