Suppr超能文献

基于氧化亚氮与无氧化亚氮的全身麻醉及外科手术患者全身麻醉期间的意外知晓

Nitrous oxide-based versus nitrous oxide-free general anaesthesia and accidental awareness during general anaesthesia in surgical patients.

作者信息

Hounsome Juliet, Nicholson Amanda, Greenhalgh Janette, Cook Tim M, Smith Andrew F, Lewis Sharon R

机构信息

Liverpool Reviews and Implementation Group, University of Liverpool, Sherrington Building, Ashton Street, Liverpool, UK, L69 3GE.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Aug 10;2016(8):CD011052. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011052.pub2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Accidental awareness during general anaesthesia (AAGA) is when a patient unintentionally becomes conscious during a procedure performed with general anaesthesia and subsequently has explicit recall of this event. Incidence estimates for AAGA vary, with the most common estimate being one to two cases per 1000 general anaesthetics. Evidence linking nitrous oxide use and an increased risk of AAGA has come from observational studies data but the literature is contradictory, with some studies finding a protective effect of nitrous oxide.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effect of general anaesthesia including nitrous oxide on the risk of AAGA in patients aged five years and over.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the following databases: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE and trial registers ((www.clinicaltrials.gov), the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (www.who.int/ictrp/network/en/) and Current Controlled Trials (www.isrctn.com/)) for eligible studies on December 9 2015. In addition, we conducted forward and backward citation searching using key identified papers.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We considered all randomized controlled trials (RCTs), including quasi-randomized studies and cluster-randomized studies, of participants aged five years or older receiving general anaesthesia for any type of surgery.We included trials in which participants receiving general anaesthesia that included nitrous oxide for maintenance at a concentration of at least 30% were compared with participants receiving no nitrous oxide during general anaesthesia. The intervention group must have received nitrous oxide in conjunction with an additional anaesthetic. We excluded studies where the depth of anaesthesia differed between the study arms. For inclusion in the review, studies needed to state in their methods that they planned to assess AAGA. We defined this as when a patient becomes conscious during a procedure performed with general anaesthesia and subsequently has explicit recall of this event.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane to identify studies. We extracted data and conducted 'Risk of bias' assessment using the Covidence database.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 15 studies. The total number of participants included in the analyses was 3520. Most studies were small with fewer than 120 participants, although two larger studies with 2012 and 671 participants were included. There was considerable variation in many of the study characteristics, including the anaesthetics used. The concentrations of nitrous oxide varied between 50% and 70%, and half of the studies used clinical signs and haemodynamic changes to monitor depth of anaesthesia.As it was not possible to blind the anaesthetist to the anaesthetic used, we rated all studies at high risk of performance bias and we therefore downgraded the quality of evidence by one level for risk of bias using the GRADE approach. Other types of bias were generally low, or were rated unclear due to missing information.No studies were designed to measure AAGA as the primary outcome, and were therefore statistically underpowered to answer this review question. Despite the inclusion of 3520 participants, only three awareness events were reported by two studies. In one study the event was due to technical failure. Due to the rarity of the events, we did not consider it appropriate to pool the data, and we therefore downgraded the quality of evidence by a further level for imprecision using GRADE.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: It is not possible to draw any conclusions from this review. The included studies were mainly small (fewer than 120 participants) and there were limited estimates of effect, with only two studies reporting any events. We cannot therefore determine whether the use of nitrous oxide in general anaesthesia increases, decreases or has no effect on the risk of accidental awareness.

摘要

背景

全身麻醉期间的意外知晓(AAGA)是指患者在全身麻醉下进行的手术过程中无意地恢复意识,并随后对该事件有明确的记忆。AAGA的发生率估计各不相同,最常见的估计是每1000例全身麻醉中有1至2例。将氧化亚氮的使用与AAGA风险增加联系起来的证据来自观察性研究数据,但文献存在矛盾,一些研究发现氧化亚氮有保护作用。

目的

评估包括氧化亚氮在内的全身麻醉对5岁及以上患者发生AAGA风险的影响。

检索方法

我们于2015年12月9日检索了以下数据库:Cochrane对照试验中心注册库(CENTRAL)、医学期刊数据库(MEDLINE)、荷兰医学文摘数据库(EMBASE)以及试验注册库((www.clinicaltrials.gov)、世界卫生组织国际临床试验注册平台(www.who.int/ictrp/network/en/)和当前对照试验(www.isrctn.com/)),以查找符合条件的研究。此外,我们使用已识别的关键论文进行了向前和向后的引文检索。

选择标准

我们纳入了所有针对5岁及以上参与者进行任何类型手术的全身麻醉的随机对照试验(RCT),包括半随机研究和整群随机研究。我们纳入了将接受浓度至少为30%的氧化亚氮用于维持麻醉的全身麻醉参与者与全身麻醉期间未接受氧化亚氮的参与者进行比较的试验。干预组必须将氧化亚氮与其他麻醉剂联合使用。我们排除了研究组之间麻醉深度不同的研究。为纳入本综述,研究需要在其方法中说明他们计划评估AAGA。我们将其定义为患者在全身麻醉下进行的手术过程中恢复意识,并随后对该事件有明确的记忆。

数据收集与分析

我们使用Cochrane期望的标准方法程序来识别研究。我们提取数据并使用Covidence数据库进行“偏倚风险”评估。

主要结果

我们纳入了15项研究。分析中纳入的参与者总数为3520人。大多数研究规模较小,参与者少于120人,不过纳入了两项规模较大的研究,分别有2012名和671名参与者。许多研究特征存在相当大的差异,包括所使用的麻醉剂。氧化亚氮的浓度在50%至70%之间变化,并且一半的研究使用临床体征和血流动力学变化来监测麻醉深度。由于无法让麻醉师对所使用的麻醉剂不知情,我们将所有研究评定为存在高实施偏倚风险,因此我们使用GRADE方法将证据质量因偏倚风险下调一级。其他类型的偏倚通常较低,或者由于信息缺失而评定为不清楚。没有研究将测量AAGA作为主要结局进行设计,因此在统计学上没有足够的能力来回答本综述问题。尽管纳入了3520名参与者,但只有两项研究报告了3起知晓事件。在一项研究中,该事件是由于技术故障。由于这些事件罕见,我们认为汇总数据不合适,因此我们使用GRADE方法因不精确性将证据质量再下调一级。

作者结论

无法从本综述中得出任何结论。纳入的研究主要规模较小(参与者少于120人),且效应估计有限,只有两项研究报告了任何事件。因此,我们无法确定全身麻醉中使用氧化亚氮是否会增加、降低或对意外知晓风险没有影响。

相似文献

1
Nitrous oxide-based versus nitrous oxide-free general anaesthesia and accidental awareness during general anaesthesia in surgical patients.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Aug 10;2016(8):CD011052. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011052.pub2.
2
Drugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults after general anaesthesia: a network meta-analysis.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 19;10(10):CD012859. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012859.pub2.
4
Spectral entropy monitoring for adults and children undergoing general anaesthesia.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Mar 14;3(3):CD010135. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010135.pub2.
5
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
6
Interventions for the treatment of brain radionecrosis after radiotherapy or radiosurgery.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jul 9;7(7):CD011492. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011492.pub2.
7
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 9;1(1):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub3.
8
Incentives for preventing smoking in children and adolescents.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jun 6;6(6):CD008645. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008645.pub3.
9
Atraumatic restorative treatment versus conventional restorative treatment for managing dental caries.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 28;12(12):CD008072. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008072.pub2.
10
Coblation versus other surgical techniques for tonsillectomy.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Aug 22;8(8):CD004619. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004619.pub3.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
Anaesthetic interventions for prevention of awareness during surgery.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Oct 18;10(10):CD007272. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007272.pub2.
2
Nitrous oxide-based techniques versus nitrous oxide-free techniques for general anaesthesia.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Nov 6;2015(11):CD008984. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008984.pub2.
4
The state of UK anaesthesia: a survey of National Health Service activity in 2013.
Br J Anaesth. 2014 Oct;113(4):575-84. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeu292. Epub 2014 Aug 7.
9
Bispectral index for improving anaesthetic delivery and postoperative recovery.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jun 17;2014(6):CD003843. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003843.pub3.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验