Suppr超能文献

编辑与出版商出版伦理声明。

Statement on Publication Ethics for Editors and Publishers.

作者信息

Gasparyan Armen Yuri, Yessirkepov Marlen, Voronov Alexander A, Gorin Sergey V, Koroleva Anna M, Kitas George D

机构信息

Departments of Rheumatology and Research and Development, Dudley Group NHS Foundation Trust (Teaching Trust of the University of Birmingham, UK), Russells Hall Hospital, Dudley, West Midlands, UK.

Department of Biochemistry, Biology and Microbiology, South Kazakhstan State Pharmaceutical Academy, Shymkent, Kazakhstan.

出版信息

J Korean Med Sci. 2016 Sep;31(9):1351-4. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2016.31.9.1351.

Abstract

The digitization and related developments in journal editing and publishing necessitate increasing the awareness of all stakeholders of science communication in the emerging global problems and possible solutions. Journal editors and publishers are frequently encountered with the fast-growing problems of authorship, conflicts of interest, peer review, research misconduct, unethical citations, and inappropriate journal impact metrics. While the number of erroneous and unethical research papers and wasteful, or 'predatory', journals is increasing exponentially, responsible editors are urged to 'clean' the literature by correcting or retracting related articles. Indexers are advised to implement measures for accepting truly influential and ethical journals and delisting sources with predatory publishing practices. Updating knowledge and skills of authors, editors and publishers, developing and endorsing recommendations of global editorial associations, and (re)drafting journal instructions can be viewed as potential tools for improving ethics of academic journals. The aim of this Statement is to increase awareness of all stakeholders of science communication of the emerging ethical issues in journal editing and publishing and initiate a campaign of upgrading and enforcing related journal instructions.

摘要

期刊编辑与出版的数字化及相关发展,使得科学界所有利益相关者都有必要提高对全球新出现问题及可能解决方案的科学传播意识。期刊编辑和出版商经常面临作者身份、利益冲突、同行评审、研究不当行为、不道德引用以及不当期刊影响指标等快速增长的问题。虽然错误和不道德的研究论文数量以及浪费性或“掠夺性”期刊呈指数级增长,但敦促负责任的编辑通过纠正或撤回相关文章来“清理”文献。建议索引编制者采取措施收录真正有影响力且符合道德规范的期刊,并将有掠夺性出版行为的来源从索引中剔除。更新作者、编辑和出版商的知识与技能,制定并认可全球编辑协会的建议,以及(重新)起草期刊投稿指南,都可被视为提升学术期刊道德规范的潜在工具。本声明的目的是提高科学界所有利益相关者对期刊编辑与出版中新出现的道德问题的认识,并发起一场升级和强化相关期刊投稿指南的行动。

相似文献

1
Statement on Publication Ethics for Editors and Publishers.
J Korean Med Sci. 2016 Sep;31(9):1351-4. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2016.31.9.1351.
2
Preserving the Integrity of Citations and References by All Stakeholders of Science Communication.
J Korean Med Sci. 2015 Nov;30(11):1545-52. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2015.30.11.1545. Epub 2015 Oct 16.
3
Turkish health field periodical editors' Views on publication process and ethical problems.
Niger J Clin Pract. 2018 Mar;21(3):264-270. doi: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_49_17.
4
Ethical dilemmas in scientific publication: pitfalls and solutions for editors.
Rev Saude Publica. 2006 Aug;40 Spec no.:24-9. doi: 10.1590/s0034-89102006000400004.
5
Improving biomedical journals' ethical policies: the case of research misconduct.
J Med Ethics. 2014 Sep;40(9):644-6. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2013-101822. Epub 2014 Feb 6.
6
Predatory Publishing Is a Threat to Non-Mainstream Science.
J Korean Med Sci. 2017 May;32(5):713-717. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2017.32.5.713.
7
The Pressure to Publish More and the Scope of Predatory Publishing Activities.
J Korean Med Sci. 2016 Dec;31(12):1874-1878. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2016.31.12.1874.
8
Ethics in forensic psychiatry publishing.
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2011;39(3):332-41.
9
Publishing Ethics and Predatory Practices: A Dilemma for All Stakeholders of Science Communication.
J Korean Med Sci. 2015 Aug;30(8):1010-6. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2015.30.8.1010. Epub 2015 Jul 15.
10
Integrity of Authorship and Peer Review Practices: Challenges and Opportunities for Improvement.
J Korean Med Sci. 2018 Oct 18;33(46):e287. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2018.33.e287. eCollection 2018 Nov 12.

引用本文的文献

2
Employing Unprofessional Editors for Handling Submissions in Scholarly Journals.
J Korean Med Sci. 2023 Oct 16;38(40):e354. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2023.38.e354.
4
Predatory journals- Can we stem the rot?
J Postgrad Med. 2019 Jul-Sep;65(3):129-131. doi: 10.4103/jpgm.JPGM_266_19.
5
Comprehensive Approach to Open Access Publishing: Platforms and Tools.
J Korean Med Sci. 2019 Jul 15;34(27):e184. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2019.34.e184.
6
Conflicts of interest disclosure policies among Chinese medical journals: A cross-sectional study.
PLoS One. 2019 Jul 9;14(7):e0219564. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219564. eCollection 2019.
7
[Not Available].
Can Fam Physician. 2019 Feb;65(2):97-99.
8
Predatory journals: Authors and readers beware.
Can Fam Physician. 2019 Feb;65(2):92-94.
9
Integrity of Authorship and Peer Review Practices: Challenges and Opportunities for Improvement.
J Korean Med Sci. 2018 Oct 18;33(46):e287. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2018.33.e287. eCollection 2018 Nov 12.
10
Editorial Abuses.
J Korean Med Sci. 2017 Dec;32(12):1908-1909. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2017.32.12.1908.

本文引用的文献

1
Scientific author names: errors, corrections, and identity profiles.
Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2016;26(2):169-73. doi: 10.11613/BM.2016.017.
3
The manuscript-editing marketplace.
Nature. 2016 Mar 3;531(7592):127-8. doi: 10.1038/531127a.
4
Authorship policies of scientific journals.
J Med Ethics. 2016 Mar;42(3):199-202. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2015-103171. Epub 2015 Dec 29.
5
Preserving the Integrity of Citations and References by All Stakeholders of Science Communication.
J Korean Med Sci. 2015 Nov;30(11):1545-52. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2015.30.11.1545. Epub 2015 Oct 16.
6
When things go wrong: correcting the scientific record.
EMBO J. 2015 Oct 14;34(20):2483-5. doi: 10.15252/embj.201570080.
7
Robust research: Institutions must do their part for reproducibility.
Nature. 2015 Sep 3;525(7567):25-7. doi: 10.1038/525025a.
8
Publishing Ethics and Predatory Practices: A Dilemma for All Stakeholders of Science Communication.
J Korean Med Sci. 2015 Aug;30(8):1010-6. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2015.30.8.1010. Epub 2015 Jul 15.
9
Predatory Publishing: What You Don't Know Can Hurt You.
Nurse Educ. 2015 Sep-Oct;40(5):217-9. doi: 10.1097/NNE.0000000000000179.
10
Rewarding peer reviewers: maintaining the integrity of science communication.
J Korean Med Sci. 2015 Apr;30(4):360-4. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2015.30.4.360. Epub 2015 Mar 19.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验