Impact of organ shape variations on margin concepts for cervix cancer ART.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Target and organ movement motivate adaptive radiotherapy for cervix cancer patients. We investigated the dosimetric impact of margin concepts with different levels of complexity on both organ at risk (OAR) sparing and PTV coverage.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Weekly CT and daily CBCT scans were delineated for 10 patients. The dosimetric impact of organ shape variations were evaluated for four (isotropic) margin concepts: two static PTVs (PTV and PTV), a PTV based on ITV of the planning CT and CBCTs of the first treatment week (PTV) and an adaptive PTV based on a library approach (PTV).

RESULTS

Using static concepts, OAR doses increased with large margins, while smaller margins compromised target coverage. ART PTVs resulted in comparable target coverage and better sparing of bladder (V40Gy: 15% and 7% less), rectum (V40Gy: 18 and 6cc less) and bowel (V40Gy: 106 and 15cc less) compared to PTV. Target coverage evaluation showed that for elective fields a static 5mm margin sufficed.

CONCLUSION

PTV achieved the best dosimetric results. However when weighing clinical benefit against workload, ITV margins based on repetitive movement evaluation during the first week also provide improvements over static margin concepts.