Chemical Engineering, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh EH144AS, UK.
Faraday Discuss. 2016 Oct 20;192:437-457. doi: 10.1039/c6fd00033a.
Among the well-known state-of-the-art technologies for CO capture, Chemical Looping Combustion (CLC) stands out for its potential to capture CO efficiently from a fuel power plant. CLC involves the combustion of carbonaceous fuel such as coal-derived syngas or natural gas via a redox chemical reaction with a solid oxygen carrier circulating between two fluidised beds. Avoided NO emissions, high CO capture and thermal efficiency are the key concepts that make worth the investigation of this technology. One of the main issues about CLC might concern the impact of the solid metal oxides price and lifetime on the Levelised Cost Of the Electricity (LCOE). A natural gas fired power plant embedding a CLC unit is presented in this work. Detailed fluidised bed models are implemented in Aspen Plus software. Kinetics and hydrodynamics are taken into account to evaluate their effect on the total solid inventory required for full fuel conversion. The models are incorporated into a power plant and a detailed economic evaluation is undertaken by varying two relevant parameters: fuel price and lifetime of the solid particles. The effect of these parameters on the LCOE is investigated and a comparison between CLC and a post-combustion technology employing amines (e.g. monoethanolamine, MEA) is presented. It is shown that the CLC power plant under study leads to a lower LCOE compared to the current MEA post-combustion solution.
在 CO 捕获的知名前沿技术中,化学循环燃烧(CLC)因其能够从燃料发电厂高效捕获 CO 的潜力而脱颖而出。CLC 涉及通过与在两个流化床之间循环的固体氧载体的氧化还原化学反应来燃烧碳质燃料,如煤衍生的合成气或天然气。避免 NO 排放、高 CO 捕获率和热效率是使该技术值得研究的关键概念。CLC 的一个主要问题可能涉及固体金属氧化物价格和寿命对平准化度电成本(LCOE)的影响。本文介绍了一个嵌入 CLC 单元的天然气火力发电厂。详细的流化床模型在 Aspen Plus 软件中实现。考虑了动力学和流体动力学来评估它们对完全燃料转化所需的总固体库存的影响。这些模型被纳入一个发电厂,并通过改变两个相关参数来进行详细的经济评估:燃料价格和固体颗粒的寿命。研究了这些参数对 LCOE 的影响,并对 CLC 和采用胺(例如单乙醇胺,MEA)的后燃烧技术进行了比较。结果表明,与当前的 MEA 后燃烧解决方案相比,所研究的 CLC 发电厂的 LCOE 更低。