Suppr超能文献

来自低社会经济环境家庭调查的残疾权重:与《2010年全球疾病负担研究》相比如何?

Disability weights from a household survey in a low socio-economic setting: how does it compare to the global burden of disease 2010 study?

作者信息

Neethling Ian, Jelsma Jennifer, Ramma Lebogang, Schneider Helen, Bradshaw Debbie

机构信息

Burden of Disease Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa;

Department of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.

出版信息

Glob Health Action. 2016 Aug 17;9:31754. doi: 10.3402/gha.v9.31754. eCollection 2016.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The global burden of disease (GBD) 2010 study used a universal set of disability weights to estimate disability adjusted life years (DALYs) by country. However, it is not clear whether these weights can be applied universally in calculating DALYs to inform local decision-making. This study derived disability weights for a resource-constrained community in Cape Town, South Africa, and interrogated whether the GBD 2010 disability weights necessarily represent the preferences of economically disadvantaged communities.

DESIGN

A household survey was conducted in Lavender Hill, Cape Town, to assess the health state preferences of the general public. The responses from a paired comparison valuation method were assessed using a probit regression. The probit coefficients were anchored onto the 0 to 1 disability weight scale by running a lowess regression on the GBD 2010 disability weights and interpolating the coefficients between the upper and lower limit of the smoothed disability weights.

RESULTS

Heroin and opioid dependence had the highest disability weight of 0.630, whereas intellectual disability had the lowest (0.040). Untreated injuries ranked higher than severe mental disorders. There were some counterintuitive results, such as moderate (15th) and severe vision impairment (16th) ranking higher than blindness (20th). A moderate correlation between the disability weights of the local study and those of the GBD 2010 study was observed (R(2)=0.440, p<0.05). This indicates that there was a relationship, although some conditions, such as untreated fracture of the radius or ulna, showed large variability in disability weights (0.488 in local study and 0.043 in GBD 2010).

CONCLUSIONS

Respondents seemed to value physical mobility higher than cognitive functioning, which is in contrast to the GBD 2010 study. This study shows that not all health state preferences are universal. Studies estimating DALYs need to derive local disability weights using methods that are less cognitively demanding for respondents.

摘要

背景

《2010年全球疾病负担(GBD)研究》使用了一套通用的残疾权重来按国家估算残疾调整生命年(DALY)。然而,尚不清楚这些权重在计算DALY以指导地方决策时是否能普遍适用。本研究得出了南非开普敦一个资源有限社区的残疾权重,并探讨了《2010年全球疾病负担研究》的残疾权重是否必然代表经济弱势社区的偏好。

设计

在开普敦的薰衣草山进行了一项家庭调查,以评估公众对健康状态的偏好。使用概率回归评估配对比较估值方法的回应。通过对《2010年全球疾病负担研究》的残疾权重进行局部加权回归,并在平滑后的残疾权重的上限和下限之间内插系数,将概率系数锚定在0至1的残疾权重量表上。

结果

海洛因和阿片类药物依赖的残疾权重最高,为0.630,而智力残疾的残疾权重最低(0.040)。未治疗的损伤排名高于严重精神障碍。存在一些与直觉相悖的结果,例如中度(第15位)和重度视力损害(第16位)的排名高于失明(第20位)。观察到本地研究的残疾权重与《2010年全球疾病负担研究》的残疾权重之间存在中度相关性(R² = 0.440,p < 0.05)。这表明存在一种关系,尽管某些情况,如未治疗的桡骨或尺骨骨折,其残疾权重存在很大差异(本地研究中为0.488,《2010年全球疾病负担研究》中为0.043)。

结论

与《2010年全球疾病负担研究》相反,受访者似乎更看重身体活动能力而非认知功能。本研究表明,并非所有健康状态偏好都是普遍适用的。估算DALY的研究需要使用对受访者认知要求较低的方法得出本地残疾权重。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4631/4990533/9fc917627935/GHA-9-31754-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验