Alite Fiori, Stang Kyle, Balasubramanian Neelam, Adams William, Shaikh Mohammad Parvez, Small Christina, Sethi Anil, Nagda Suneel, Emami Bahman, Harkenrider Matthew M
Department of Radiation Oncology, Stritch School of Medicine, Loyola University Chicago, Maywood, Illinois, United States.
Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States.
Radiother Oncol. 2016 Oct;121(1):9-14. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2016.07.026. Epub 2016 Aug 16.
Recent reports demonstrate impaired tumor re-oxygenation 24-48h after stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), suggesting that non-consecutive treatment delivery may be advantageous. To test this hypothesis clinically, we compared local control in patients treated in consecutive daily fractions vs. nonconsecutive fractions.
We retrospectively reviewed 107 lung SBRT patients (117 tumors) treated for T1-T2N0 NSCLC with LINAC based SBRT (50 or 60Gy/5fractions). Patients were characterized as having been treated in consecutive daily fractions vs. in non-consecutive fractions. Local control, survival and toxicity end points (CTCAE V4.0) were compared. Propensity score matching and Cox regression analyses were performed in order to determine the effect of fractionation on local control.
With a median follow up of 23.7months, 3-year local control was superior at 93.3% vs. 63.6% in the non-consecutive and consecutive group, respectively (p=0.001). Multivariate analysis and propensity score matching showed that consecutive fractionation was an independent predictor of local failure. Overall survival trended toward improvement in the non-consecutive group, but this was not statistically significant (p=0.188). Development of any grade 2 toxicity was not significantly different between the two groups (p=0.75).
Five-fraction SBRT delivered over non-consecutive days imparts superior LC and similar toxicity compared to consecutive fractionation. These results should be validated in independent datasets and in a prospective fashion.
近期报告显示,立体定向体部放射治疗(SBRT)后24 - 48小时肿瘤再氧合受损,这表明非连续治疗方案可能更具优势。为了在临床上验证这一假设,我们比较了连续每日分次治疗与非连续分次治疗患者的局部控制情况。
我们回顾性分析了107例接受基于直线加速器的SBRT(50或60Gy/5次)治疗T1 - T2N0非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的肺SBRT患者(117个肿瘤)。患者被分为连续每日分次治疗组和非连续分次治疗组。比较局部控制、生存和毒性终点(CTCAE V4.0)。进行倾向评分匹配和Cox回归分析,以确定分次治疗对局部控制的影响。
中位随访23.7个月,3年局部控制率在非连续组和连续组分别为93.3%和63.6%,非连续组显著更高(p = 0.001)。多变量分析和倾向评分匹配显示,连续分次治疗是局部失败的独立预测因素。总体生存情况在非连续组有改善趋势,但无统计学意义(p = 0.188)。两组间任何2级毒性的发生情况无显著差异(p = 0.75)。
与连续分次治疗相比,非连续日进行的5分次SBRT具有更好的局部控制率和相似的毒性。这些结果应在独立数据集中以前瞻性方式进行验证。