Suppr超能文献

初步研究:除皮肤点刺试验和血清特异性IgE外,使用微阵列分析评估特应性儿童的过敏临床诊断。

Pilot study: assessing the clinical diagnosis of allergy in atopic children using a microarray assay in addition to skin prick testing and serum specific IgE.

作者信息

Foong Ru-Xin, Roberts Graham, Fox Adam Tobias, du Toit George

机构信息

Division of Asthma, Allergy and Lung Biology, Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, SE1 7EH UK ; Institute of Child Health, University College of London, London, UK.

University of Southampton and National Institute for Health Research Respiratory Biomedical Research Unit, Southampton and David Hide Centre, Southampton, UK.

出版信息

Clin Mol Allergy. 2016 Aug 19;14:8. doi: 10.1186/s12948-016-0046-z. eCollection 2016.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Children with atopic dermatitis (AD) are at risk of developing allergy. Alongside clinical history, testing modalities include skin prick tests (SPT), specific immunoglobulin-E (sp-IgE) and recently, microarray assays. The aim of this pilot study was to assess current tests and the ISAC sIgE-112 system in the diagnosis of food and aeroallergen allergy.

METHODS

Children aged 0-11 years with moderate to severe AD were included. An initial allergy assessment including clinical history, SPT and sp-IgE was performed to determine food and aeroallergen sensitization. A second independent clinical assessment using the same information given to the first assessor and ISAC test results for food and aeroallergen sensitization was also made for each participant. The results from both were compared.

RESULTS

30 children [mean age 3.91 years (SD 3.3)] were included; 53.3 and 46.7 % had moderate and severe AD, respectively. Sp-IgE tests had a higher percentage of positive results compared to SPT and ISAC tests for common allergens. There was a significant difference between the three tests in detecting aeroallergen sensitization (p = 0.038), especially between sp-IgE and ISAC tests, but no significant difference between the tests for food allergen sensitization. There was good agreement between the two assessors; 70 % of the children had a change in diagnosis, with 60 % having at least one diagnosis added and 40 % having at least one diagnosis removed.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a role for the use of ISAC testing in diagnosing sensitization and allergy in children with AD as it leads to a change in diagnosis for many patients. Further work is required to assess its clinical and cost effectiveness.

摘要

背景

特应性皮炎(AD)患儿有发生过敏的风险。除临床病史外,检测方法包括皮肤点刺试验(SPT)、特异性免疫球蛋白E(sp-IgE),以及最近的微阵列分析。这项初步研究的目的是评估当前检测方法和ISAC sIgE-112系统在食物和吸入性过敏原过敏诊断中的应用。

方法

纳入0至11岁中重度AD患儿。进行了包括临床病史、SPT和sp-IgE的初步过敏评估,以确定食物和吸入性过敏原致敏情况。还为每位参与者进行了第二次独立临床评估,使用与第一位评估者相同的信息以及食物和吸入性过敏原致敏的ISAC检测结果。比较两者的结果。

结果

纳入30名儿童[平均年龄3.91岁(标准差3.3)];分别有53.3%和46.7%的患儿患有中度和重度AD。对于常见过敏原,sp-IgE检测的阳性结果百分比高于SPT和ISAC检测。三种检测方法在检测吸入性过敏原致敏方面存在显著差异(p = 0.038),尤其是sp-IgE和ISAC检测之间,但在食物过敏原致敏检测方面差异不显著。两位评估者之间一致性良好;70%的儿童诊断有变化,其中60%至少增加了一项诊断,40%至少去除了一项诊断。

结论

ISAC检测在诊断AD患儿的致敏和过敏方面有一定作用,因为它导致许多患者的诊断发生变化。需要进一步开展工作来评估其临床和成本效益。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验