Suppr超能文献

缺血性中风相关性肺炎的预测:三种评分方法的比较

Prediction of Ischemic Stroke-Associated Pneumonia: A Comparison between 3 Scores.

作者信息

Helmy Tamer Abdallah, Abd-Elhady Mohamed Abd-Elalim, Abdou Mohammed

机构信息

Critical Care Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt.

Intensive Care Unit, Mamoura Chest Hospital, Alexandria, Egypt.

出版信息

J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2016 Nov;25(11):2756-2761. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2016.07.030. Epub 2016 Aug 20.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Stroke is a leading cause of death and disability worldwide. Among all poststroke complications, pneumonia constitutes a major complication with a strong impact on morbidity and mortality. To identify patients at high risk of stroke-associated pneumonia (SAP) and to tailor a prophylactic approach, a reliable scoring model for prediction may be useful in daily stroke care.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to compare the performance of the Age, Atrial fibrillation, Dysphagia, Sex, Stroke Severity (ADS) score, the acute ischemic stroke-associated pneumonia score (AIS-APS), and the Preventive ANtibacterial THERapy in acute Ischemic Stroke (PANTHERIS) score in predicting SAP.

METHODS

Seventy consecutive patients with ischemic stroke admitted to the Critical Care Medicine Department of Alexandria Main University Hospital were included. Patients were prospectively followed up for primary outcome of pneumonia within the first 7 days after admission diagnosed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention criteria. Accuracy in predicting outcome measures was assessed by calculating the area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).

RESULTS

Twenty-six (37.1%) patients developed pneumonia by the seventh day; the ADS score AUC was .847 (95% CI: .741-.922), and the AIS-APS AUC was .798 (95% CI: .685-.884). The PANTHERIS score AUC was .715 (95% CI: .595-.817). The ADS score AUC was significantly higher than the AIS-APS and the PANTHERIS score AUCs (P = .048 and P = .009 respectively), and the AIS-APS AUC was significantly higher than the PANTHERIS score AUC (P = .044).

CONCLUSIONS

The ADS score is a valid tool for the prediction of SAP based on routinely collected data, and among the 3 studied scores, it shows the best performance in predicting SAP.

摘要

背景

中风是全球死亡和残疾的主要原因。在所有中风后并发症中,肺炎是一种主要并发症,对发病率和死亡率有重大影响。为了识别中风相关性肺炎(SAP)的高危患者并制定预防性措施,一种可靠的预测评分模型可能有助于日常中风护理。

目的

本研究旨在比较年龄、房颤、吞咽困难、性别、中风严重程度(ADS)评分、急性缺血性中风相关性肺炎评分(AIS-APS)和急性缺血性中风预防性抗菌治疗(PANTHERIS)评分在预测SAP方面的表现。

方法

纳入了连续70例入住亚历山大主大学医院重症医学科的缺血性中风患者。按照美国疾病控制与预防中心的标准,对患者入院后前7天内肺炎的主要结局进行前瞻性随访。通过计算受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)来评估预测结局指标的准确性。

结果

到第7天,26例(37.1%)患者发生了肺炎;ADS评分的AUC为0.847(95%可信区间:0.741-0.922),AIS-APS评分的AUC为0.798(95%可信区间:0.685-0.884)。PANTHERIS评分的AUC为0.715(95%可信区间:0.595-0.817)。ADS评分的AUC显著高于AIS-APS评分和PANTHERIS评分的AUC(分别为P = 0.048和P = 0.009),且AIS-APS评分的AUC显著高于PANTHERIS评分的AUC(P = 0.044)。

结论

基于常规收集的数据,ADS评分是预测SAP的有效工具,在研究的3个评分中,它在预测SAP方面表现最佳。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验