Sawangjit Ratree, Khan Tahir Mehmood, Chaiyakunapruk Nathorn
Clinical Pharmacy Research Unit (CPRU), Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Mahasarakham University, Mahasarakham, Thailand.
School of Pharmacy, Monash University Malaysia, Bandar Sunway, Selangor, Malaysia.
Addiction. 2017 Feb;112(2):236-247. doi: 10.1111/add.13593. Epub 2016 Oct 19.
To appraise the evidence critically for effectiveness of pharmacy-based needle/syringe exchange programmes (pharmacy-based NSPs) on risk behaviours (RBs), HIV/HCV prevalence and economic outcomes among people who inject drugs (PWID).
Systematic review and meta-analysis.
Primary care setting.
Of 1568 studies screened, 14 studies with 7035 PWID were included.
PubMed, Embase, Web of Sciences, CENTRAL and Cochrane review databases were searched without language restriction from their inception to 27 January 2016. All published study designs with control groups that reported the effectiveness of pharmacy-based NSP on outcomes of interest were included. Outcomes of interest are risk behaviour (RB), HIV/hepatitis C virus (HCV) prevalence and economic outcomes. The estimates of pooled effects of these outcomes were calculated as pooled odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) using a random-effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed by I and χ tests.
Most studies (nine of 14, 64.3%) were rated as having a serious risk of bias, while 28.6 and 7.1% were rated as having a moderate risk and low risk of bias, respectively. For sharing-syringe behaviour, pharmacy-based NSPs were significantly better than no NSPs for both main (OR = 0.50, 95% CI = 0.34-0.73; I = 59.6%) and sensitivity analyses, excluding studies with a serious risk of bias (OR = 0.52, 95% CI = 0.32-0.84; I = 41.4%). For safe syringe disposal and HIV/HCV prevalence, the evidence for pharmacy-based NSPs compared with other NSP or no NSP was unclear, as few of the studies reported this and most of them had a serious risk of bias. Compared with the total life-time cost of US$55 640 for treating a person with HIV infection, the HIV prevalence among PWID has to be at least 0.8% (for pharmacy-based NSPs) or 2.1% (for other NSPs) to result in cost-savings.
Pharmacy-based needle/syringe exchange programmes appear to be effective for reducing risk behaviours among people who inject drugs, although their effect on HIV/HCV prevalence and economic outcomes is unclear.
严格评估以药房为基础的针头/注射器交换项目(基于药房的针具交换项目)在注射吸毒者(PWID)的风险行为、艾滋病毒/丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)感染率及经济成果方面的有效性证据。
系统评价和荟萃分析。
初级保健机构。
在筛选的1568项研究中,纳入了14项研究,涉及7035名注射吸毒者。
检索了PubMed、Embase、Web of Sciences、CENTRAL和Cochrane综述数据库,检索时间从各数据库建立至2016年1月27日,无语言限制。纳入所有发表的带有对照组且报告了基于药房的针具交换项目对感兴趣结局有效性的研究设计。感兴趣的结局包括风险行为、艾滋病毒/丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)感染率及经济成果。使用随机效应模型计算这些结局合并效应的估计值,以合并比值比(OR)及其95%置信区间(CI)表示。通过I²和χ²检验评估异质性。
大多数研究(14项中的9项,64.3%)被评为存在严重偏倚风险,而分别有28.6%和7.1%被评为存在中度和低度偏倚风险。对于共用注射器行为,在主要分析(OR = 0.50,95% CI = 0.34 - 0.73;I² = 59.6%)和敏感性分析(排除存在严重偏倚风险的研究,OR = 0.52,95% CI = 0.32 - 0.84;I² = 41.4%)中,基于药房的针具交换项目均显著优于无针具交换项目。对于安全注射器处理及艾滋病毒/丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)感染率,与其他针具交换项目或无针具交换项目相比,基于药房的针具交换项目的证据不明确,因为很少有研究报告此方面内容,且大多数研究存在严重偏倚风险。与治疗一名艾滋病毒感染者的终生总成本55640美元相比,注射吸毒者中的艾滋病毒感染率必须至少达到0.8%(基于药房的针具交换项目)或2.1%(其他针具交换项目)才能实现成本节约。
基于药房的针头/注射器交换项目似乎对减少注射吸毒者的风险行为有效,尽管其对艾滋病毒/丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)感染率及经济成果的影响尚不清楚。