Maru Sheela, Rajeev Sindhya, Pokhrel Richa, Poudyal Agya, Mehta Pooja, Bista Deepak, Borgatta Lynn, Maru Duncan
Bayalpata Hospital, Possible, Sanfebagar-10, Achham, Nepal.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016 Aug 27;16(1):252. doi: 10.1186/s12884-016-1022-9.
Encouraging institutional birth is an important component of reducing maternal mortality in low-resource settings. This study aims to identify and understand the determinants of persistently low institutional birth in rural Nepal, with the goal of informing future interventions to reduce high rates of maternal mortality.
Postpartum women giving birth in the catchment area population of a district-level hospital in the Far-Western Development Region of Nepal were invited to complete a cross-sectional survey in 2012 about their recent birth experience. Quantitative and qualitative methods were used to determine the institutional birth rate, social and demographic predictors of institutional birth, and barriers to institutional birth.
The institutional birth rate for the hospital's catchment area population was calculated to be 0.30 (54 home births, 23 facility births). Institutional birth was more likely as age decreased (ORs in the range of 0.20-0.28) and as income increased (ORs in the range of 1.38-1.45). Institutional birth among women who owned land was less likely (OR = 0.82 [0.71, 0.92]). Ninety percent of participants in the institutional birth group identified safety and good care as the most important factors determining location of birth, whereas 60 % of participants in the home birth group reported distance from hospital as a key determinant of location of birth. Qualitative analysis elucidated the importance of social support, financial resources, birth planning, awareness of services, perception of safety, and referral capacity in achieving an institutional birth.
Age, income, and land ownership, but not patient preference, were key predictors of institutional birth. Most women believed that birth at the hospital was safer regardless of where they gave birth. Future interventions to increase rates of institutional birth should address structural barriers including differences in socioeconomic status, social support, transportation resources, and birth preparedness.
在资源匮乏地区,鼓励在医疗机构分娩是降低孕产妇死亡率的重要组成部分。本研究旨在确定并了解尼泊尔农村地区机构分娩率持续偏低的决定因素,以便为今后降低高孕产妇死亡率的干预措施提供依据。
2012年,邀请在尼泊尔远西发展区一家区级医院集水区人口中分娩的产后妇女完成一项关于其近期分娩经历的横断面调查。采用定量和定性方法确定机构分娩率、机构分娩的社会和人口预测因素以及机构分娩的障碍。
该医院集水区人口的机构分娩率经计算为0.30(54例在家分娩,23例在医疗机构分娩)。随着年龄的降低(比值比在0.20 - 0.28范围内)和收入的增加(比值比在1.38 - 1.45范围内),机构分娩的可能性更大。拥有土地的妇女进行机构分娩的可能性较小(比值比 = 0.82 [0.71, 0.92])。机构分娩组中90%的参与者认为安全和良好护理是决定分娩地点的最重要因素,而在家分娩组中60%的参与者报告距离医院远近是决定分娩地点的关键因素。定性分析阐明了社会支持、经济资源、生育计划、服务意识、安全认知和转诊能力在实现机构分娩方面的重要性。
年龄、收入和土地所有权而非患者偏好是机构分娩的关键预测因素。大多数妇女认为无论她们在哪里分娩,在医院分娩都更安全。未来提高机构分娩率的干预措施应解决结构性障碍,包括社会经济地位差异、社会支持、交通资源和分娩准备情况等。