Taylor G A, Eich M R
Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital National Medical Center, Washington, D.C. 20010.
Ann Surg. 1989 Aug;210(2):229-33. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198908000-00016.
This paper examines the role of neurologic impairment as an indication for CT examination of the abdomen in children after blunt trauma. The clinical information and abdominal CT examinations of 482 consecutive children were reviewed prospectively for indications for abdominal CT and presence and severity of abdominal and chest injury. Children were divided into two groups determined by Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS): GCS less than 8, and greater than or equal to 8. The prevalence and severity of thoracoabdominal injury were higher in the neurologically impaired group. These children had a higher frequency of abdominal injury (GCS less than 8, 25 of 90 patients (27.8%) vs. GCS greater than or equal to 8, 70 of 392 patients (17.8%); p = 0.047 by Chi square test), injury to multiple abdominal organs (16.7% vs. 4.8%; p = 0.0002), chest injury (32.2% vs. 0.09%; p = 0.0001), and combined chest and abdominal injury (18.9% vs. 4.6%; p = 0.0001). In addition, the mortality rate in children with a GCS less than 8 was significantly higher (GCS less than 8, 24% vs. GCS greater than or equal to 8, 0.26%; p = 0.0001). Eleven children had a GCS less than 8 as the only indication for abdominal CT examination. All 11 children had a normal CT of the abdomen. Every child with abdominal injury on CT scan had specific abdominal signs suggestive of underlying injury. Three neurologically impaired children required abdominal surgery (3.3%) vs. 14 of 369 (3.8%) children with a GCS greater than or equal to 8; p = NS). We conclude that children with severe neurologic impairment are at higher risk for intraabdominal injury than those without coma, but that neurologic impairment without abdominal signs is a low-yield indication for abdominal CT examination. Abdominal CT scan should be reserved for children in whom there is a high clinical index of suspicion of significant abdominal trauma based on physical examination and the mechanism of injury.
本文探讨了神经功能损伤在钝性创伤后儿童腹部CT检查指征中的作用。前瞻性回顾了482例连续儿童的临床信息和腹部CT检查结果,以确定腹部CT检查的指征以及腹部和胸部损伤的存在情况及严重程度。根据格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)将儿童分为两组:GCS小于8分和大于或等于8分。神经功能受损组胸腹部损伤的发生率和严重程度更高。这些儿童腹部损伤的频率更高(GCS小于8分,90例患者中有25例(27.8%),而GCS大于或等于8分,392例患者中有70例(17.8%);卡方检验p = 0.047),多腹部器官损伤(16.7%对4.8%;p = 0.0002),胸部损伤(32.2%对0.09%;p = 0.0001),以及胸部和腹部联合损伤(18.9%对4.6%;p = 0.0001)。此外,GCS小于8分的儿童死亡率显著更高(GCS小于8分,24%,而GCS大于或等于8分,0.26%;p = 0.0001)。11例儿童GCS小于8分是腹部CT检查的唯一指征。所有11例儿童腹部CT均正常。CT扫描显示腹部损伤的每个儿童都有提示潜在损伤的特定腹部体征。3例神经功能受损儿童需要进行腹部手术(3.3%),而GCS大于或等于8分的369例儿童中有14例(3.8%);p = 无显著性差异)。我们得出结论,与无昏迷的儿童相比,严重神经功能损伤儿童发生腹内损伤的风险更高,但无腹部体征的神经功能损伤是腹部CT检查的低收益指征。腹部CT扫描应仅用于基于体格检查和损伤机制高度怀疑有严重腹部创伤的儿童。