Suppr超能文献

医疗保险患者中晚期非鳞状非小细胞肺癌一线治疗的治疗模式及成本效益

Treatment patterns and cost-effectiveness of first line treatment of advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer in Medicare patients.

作者信息

Gilden Daniel M, Kubisiak Joanna M, Pohl Gerhardt M, Ball Daniel E, Gilden David E, John William J, Wetmore Stewart, Winfree Katherine B

机构信息

a JEN Associates , Cambridge , MA , USA.

b Eli Lilly and Company , Indianapolis , IN , USA.

出版信息

J Med Econ. 2017 Feb;20(2):151-161. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2016.1230550. Epub 2016 Sep 14.

Abstract

AIM

To assess the cost-effectiveness of first-line pemetrexed/platinum and other commonly administered regimens in a representative US elderly population with advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study utilized the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) cancer registry linked to Medicare claims records. The study population included all SEER-Medicare patients diagnosed in 2008-2009 with advanced non-squamous NSCLC (stages IIIB-IV) as their only primary cancer and who started chemotherapy within 90 days of diagnosis. The study evaluated the four most commonly observed first-line regimens: paclitaxel/carboplatin, platinum monotherapy, pemetrexed/platinum, and paclitaxel/carboplatin/bevacizumab. Overall survival and total healthcare cost comparisons as well as incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were calculated for pemetrexed/platinum vs each of the other three. Unstratified analyses and analyses stratified by initial disease stage were conducted.

RESULTS

The final study population consisted of 2,461 patients. Greater administrative censorship of pemetrexed recipients at the end of the study period disproportionately reduced the observed mean survival for pemetrexed/platinum recipients. The disease stage-stratified ICER analysis found that the pemetrexed/platinum incurred total Medicare costs of $536,424 and $283,560 per observed additional year of life relative to platinum monotherapy and paclitaxel/carboplatin, respectively. The pemetrexed/platinum vs triplet comparator analysis indicated that pemetrexed/platinum was associated with considerably lower total Medicare costs, with no appreciable survival difference.

LIMITATIONS

Limitations included differential censorship of the study regimen recipients and differential administration of radiotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Pemetrexed/platinum yielded either improved survival at increased cost or similar survival at reduced cost relative to comparator regimens in the treatment of advanced non-squamous NSCLC. Limitations in the study methodology suggest that the observed pemetrexed survival benefit was likely conservative.

摘要

目的

评估培美曲塞/铂类一线治疗方案及其他常用治疗方案在美国有代表性的老年晚期非鳞状非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者中的成本效益。

材料与方法

本研究利用监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)癌症登记系统与医疗保险理赔记录相链接的数据。研究人群包括2008 - 2009年被诊断为晚期非鳞状NSCLC(ⅢB - Ⅳ期)且为唯一原发性癌症、在诊断后90天内开始化疗的所有SEER - 医疗保险患者。该研究评估了四种最常观察到的一线治疗方案:紫杉醇/卡铂、铂类单药治疗、培美曲塞/铂类以及紫杉醇/卡铂/贝伐单抗。计算了培美曲塞/铂类与其他三种方案各自相比的总生存期、总医疗费用比较以及增量成本效益比(ICER)。进行了未分层分析以及按初始疾病阶段分层的分析。

结果

最终研究人群包括2461例患者。在研究期结束时,对培美曲塞接受者的行政审查力度更大,这不成比例地降低了培美曲塞/铂类接受者观察到的平均生存期。疾病阶段分层的ICER分析发现,相对于铂类单药治疗和紫杉醇/卡铂,培美曲塞/铂类每多观察到一年生命,分别产生536,424美元和283,560美元的医疗保险总费用。培美曲塞/铂类与三联疗法对照分析表明,培美曲塞/铂类的医疗保险总费用显著更低,且生存期无明显差异。

局限性

局限性包括对研究方案接受者的审查差异以及放疗的使用差异。

结论

在治疗晚期非鳞状NSCLC方面,相对于对照方案,培美曲塞/铂类要么以增加成本为代价提高了生存期,要么以降低成本为代价获得了相似的生存期。研究方法的局限性表明观察到的培美曲塞生存获益可能较为保守。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验