Suppr超能文献

斯堪的纳维亚SSAI关于急性循环衰竭患者一线血管升压药选择的临床实践指南。

Scandinavian SSAI clinical practice guideline on choice of first-line vasopressor for patients with acute circulatory failure.

作者信息

Møller M H, Claudius C, Junttila E, Haney M, Oscarsson-Tibblin A, Haavind A, Perner A

机构信息

Department of Intensive Care, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Denmark.

Department of Anaesthesiology, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland.

出版信息

Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2016 Nov;60(10):1347-1366. doi: 10.1111/aas.12780. Epub 2016 Aug 31.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Adult critically ill patients often suffer from acute circulatory failure, necessitating use of vasopressor therapy. The aim of the Scandinavian Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (SSAI) task force for Acute Circulatory Failure was to present clinically relevant, evidence-based treatment recommendations on this topic.

METHODS

This guideline was developed according to standards for trustworthy guidelines, including a systematic review of the literature and use of the GRADE methodology for assessment of the quality of evidence and for moving from evidence to recommendations. We assessed the following subpopulations of patients with acute circulatory failure: 1) shock in general, 2) septic shock, 3) cardiogenic shock, 4) hypovolemic shock and 5) other types of shock, including vasodilatory shock. We assessed patient-important outcome measures, including mortality, serious adverse reactions and quality-of-life.

RESULTS

For patients with shock in general and those with septic shock, we recommend using norepinephrine rather than dopamine, and we suggest using norepinephrine rather than epinephrine, vasopressin analogues, and phenylephrine. For patients with cardiogenic shock and those with hypovolemic shock, we suggest using norepinephrine rather than dopamine, and we provide no recommendations/suggestions of norepinephrine vs. epinephrine, vasopressin analogues, and phenylephrine. For patients with other types of shock, including vasodilatory shock, we suggest using norepinephrine rather than dopamine, epinephrine, vasopressin analogues, and phenylephrine.

CONCLUSIONS

We recommend using norepinephrine rather than other vasopressors as first-line treatment for the majority of adult critically ill patients with acute circulatory failure.

摘要

背景

成年危重症患者常发生急性循环衰竭,需要使用血管活性药物治疗。斯堪的纳维亚麻醉与重症监护医学学会(SSAI)急性循环衰竭特别工作组的目的是就该主题提出具有临床相关性的、基于证据的治疗建议。

方法

本指南是根据可靠指南的标准制定的,包括对文献进行系统评价,并使用GRADE方法评估证据质量以及从证据得出建议。我们评估了以下急性循环衰竭患者亚组:1)一般休克,2)脓毒性休克,3)心源性休克,4)低血容量性休克,5)其他类型的休克,包括血管扩张性休克。我们评估了对患者重要的结局指标,包括死亡率、严重不良反应和生活质量。

结果

对于一般休克患者和脓毒性休克患者,我们建议使用去甲肾上腺素而非多巴胺,并且建议使用去甲肾上腺素而非肾上腺素、血管加压素类似物和去氧肾上腺素。对于心源性休克患者和低血容量性休克患者,我们建议使用去甲肾上腺素而非多巴胺,对于去甲肾上腺素与肾上腺素、血管加压素类似物和去氧肾上腺素的比较,我们未给出推荐/建议。对于其他类型的休克患者,包括血管扩张性休克,我们建议使用去甲肾上腺素而非多巴胺、肾上腺素、血管加压素类似物和去氧肾上腺素。

结论

对于大多数成年急性循环衰竭危重症患者,我们建议使用去甲肾上腺素而非其他血管活性药物作为一线治疗。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6cb/5213738/41a3dc6c6273/AAS-60-1347-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验