Ogawa Shimpei, Hida Jin-Ichi, Ike Hideyuki, Kinugasa Tetsushi, Ota Mitsuyoshi, Shinto Eiji, Itabashi Michio, Okamoto Takahiro, Sugihara Kenichi
Department of Surgery II, Tokyo Women's Medical University School of Medicine, 8-1, Kawada-cho, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 162-8666, Japan.
Department of Surgery, Kindai University School of Medicine, 377-2, Ohno-Higashi, Osaka-Sayama, Osaka, 589-8511, Japan.
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2016 Oct;31(10):1719-28. doi: 10.1007/s00384-016-2641-3. Epub 2016 Aug 30.
This study seeks to evaluate lateral pelvic lymph node (LPLN) and perirectal lymph node (PRLN) status on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as potential risk factors for lymph node metastasis.
The subjects were 394 patients with lower rectal cancer who underwent MRI prior to mesorectal excision (combined with lateral pelvic lymph node dissection in 272 patients) at 6 institutes. No patients received neoadjuvant therapy. Cases were classified as cN(+) and cN(-) based on the short axis of the largest lymph node ≥5 and <5 mm, respectively. LPLN and PRLN status and other clinicopathologic factors were analyzed by multivariate logistic regression. The importance of identified risk factors for lymph node metastasis was examined using the area under the curve (AUC).
Independent risk factors for right LPLN metastasis included histopathological grade (G3 + G4), pPRLN(+), M1, cLPLN(+) [odds ratio (OR) 10.73, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 4.59-27.1], and those for left LPLN metastasis were age (<64), histopathological grade (G3 + G4), pPRLN(+), and cLPLN(+) (OR 24.53, 95 % CI 9.16-77.7). ORs for cLPLN(+) were highest. The AUCs for right and left cLPLN status of 0.7484 (95 % CI 0.6672-0.8153) and 0.7904 (95 % CI 0.7088-0.8538), respectively, were significantly higher than those for other risk factors. In contrast, the ORs for cPRLN(+) and cPRLN status of 2.46 (95 % CI 1.47-4.18) and 0.6396 (95 % CI 0.5917-0.6848) were not much higher than for other factors.
An LPLN-positive status with a short axis ≥5 mm on MRI is an important predictor of LPLN metastasis, but PRLN status is not a strong predictor of PRLN metastasis.
本研究旨在评估磁共振成像(MRI)上的侧盆腔淋巴结(LPLN)和直肠周围淋巴结(PRLN)状态作为淋巴结转移的潜在危险因素。
研究对象为394例低位直肠癌患者,这些患者在6家机构接受了直肠系膜切除术前的MRI检查(其中272例患者还接受了侧盆腔淋巴结清扫术)。所有患者均未接受新辅助治疗。根据最大淋巴结短轴≥5mm和<5mm,将病例分别分类为cN(+)和cN(-)。通过多因素逻辑回归分析LPLN和PRLN状态以及其他临床病理因素。使用曲线下面积(AUC)检验确定的淋巴结转移危险因素的重要性。
右侧LPLN转移的独立危险因素包括组织病理学分级(G3+G4)、pPRLN(+)、M1、cLPLN(+) [优势比(OR)10.73,95%置信区间(CI)4.59-27.1],左侧LPLN转移的危险因素为年龄(<64岁)、组织病理学分级(G3+G4)、pPRLN(+)和cLPLN(+)(OR 24.53,95%CI 9.16-77.7)。cLPLN(+)的OR值最高。右侧和左侧cLPLN状态的AUC分别为0.7484(95%CI 0.6672-0.8153)和0.7904(95%CI 0.7088-0.8538),显著高于其他危险因素。相比之下,cPRLN(+)和cPRLN状态的OR值分别为2.46(95%CI 1.47-4.18)和0.6396(95%CI 0.5917-0.6848),并不比其他因素高很多。
MRI上短轴≥5mm的LPLN阳性状态是LPLN转移的重要预测指标,但PRLN状态不是PRLN转移的强预测指标。