Suppr超能文献

科学网、Scopus和谷歌学术的引用率:医学物理与生物医学工程案例研究:哪些被引用了,哪些没有?

Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar citation rates: a case study of medical physics and biomedical engineering: what gets cited and what doesn't?

作者信息

Trapp Jamie

机构信息

School of Chemistry, Physics, and Mechanical Engineering, Queensland University of Technology, GPO Box 2434, Brisbane, QLD, 4001, Australia.

出版信息

Australas Phys Eng Sci Med. 2016 Dec;39(4):817-823. doi: 10.1007/s13246-016-0478-2. Epub 2016 Aug 30.

Abstract

There are often differences in a publication's citation count, depending on the database accessed. Here, aspects of citation counts for medical physics and biomedical engineering papers are studied using papers published in the journal Australasian physical and engineering sciences in medicine. Comparison is made between the Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar. Papers are categorised into subject matter, and citation trends are examined. It is shown that review papers as a group tend to receive more citations on average; however the highest cited individual papers are more likely to be research papers.

摘要

根据所访问的数据库不同,出版物的被引频次往往存在差异。在此,我们利用发表在《澳大利亚医学物理与工程科学杂志》上的论文,研究医学物理和生物医学工程论文的被引频次情况。对科学引文索引(Web of Science)、Scopus和谷歌学术(Google Scholar)进行了比较。将论文按主题分类,并研究其被引趋势。结果表明,综述论文作为一个群体平均而言往往获得更多的引用;然而,被引次数最高的单篇论文更有可能是研究论文。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验