Suppr超能文献

电子烟二手蒸汽中化学物质知识与美国成年人对暴露危害的认知。

Knowledge about Chemicals in e-Cigarette Secondhand Vapor and Perceived Harms of Exposure among a National Sample of U.S. Adults.

机构信息

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Population Sciences Division, Center for Community Based Research, Boston, MA, USA.

Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

Risk Anal. 2017 Jun;37(6):1170-1180. doi: 10.1111/risa.12676. Epub 2016 Sep 5.

Abstract

Potentially harmful chemicals are detectable in e-cigarette secondhand vapor (hereafter SHV), contrary to advertising and marketing claims that it contains "only water vapor." We assessed public knowledge about the presence of chemicals in SHV and associations between knowledge and perceived harms of exposure to SHV. We conducted an online survey of a nationally representative sample of 1,449 U.S. adults (GfK's KnowledgePanel) from October to December 2013. Respondents were asked whether e-cigarette vapor contains only water vapor, contains tar, or contains formaldehyde (true/ false/ do not know). Responses to these three items were recoded (1 = incorrect, 2 = do not know, and 3 = correct) and averaged into a knowledge scale. They were also asked if they perceived breathing SHV to be harmful to one's health (two-item scale) and comparative harm of breathing SHV versus breathing secondhand smoke (SHS). Multiple regression analyses were weighted to the U.S. adult population and adjusted for potential confounders. Most respondents (58-75%) reported not knowing whether SHV contained only water vapor, if SHV contained tar, and if it contained formaldehyde. African-American respondents (vs. white) and current smokers (vs. nonsmokers) had lower levels of knowledge about chemicals in SHV. Adjusting for covariates, correct knowledge about chemicals in SHV was associated with higher perceived harms about SHV for one's health and perceived comparative harm of SHV versus SHS. These findings suggest a need to provide accurate information about the presence of chemicals in SHV (e.g., using product ingredient labels or public education).

摘要

电子烟二手蒸汽(以下简称 SHV)中可检测到潜在有害化学物质,这与电子烟广告和营销声称的“只含有水蒸气”相矛盾。我们评估了公众对 SHV 中化学物质存在的认识,以及这种认识与对 SHV 暴露危害的感知之间的关联。我们于 2013 年 10 月至 12 月期间对美国全国代表性样本 1449 名成年人(GfK 的 KnowledgePanel)进行了在线调查。受访者被问及电子烟蒸汽是否只含有水蒸气、是否含有焦油,或是否含有甲醛(真/假/不知道)。对这三个问题的回答进行了重新编码(1=错误,2=不知道,3=正确)并平均计入知识量表。他们还被问及他们是否认为吸入 SHV 对健康有害(两项目量表),以及吸入 SHV 与吸入二手烟(SHS)的相对危害。多变量回归分析进行了加权处理,以适应美国成年人口,并调整了潜在的混杂因素。大多数受访者(58-75%)表示不知道 SHV 是否只含有水蒸气,如果 SHV 含有焦油,以及是否含有甲醛。与白人相比,非裔美国人受访者和当前吸烟者(与非吸烟者相比)对 SHV 中化学物质的了解程度较低。在调整了混杂因素后,对 SHV 中化学物质的正确认识与对 SHV 对健康的危害感知以及对 SHV 与 SHS 相对危害的感知较高有关。这些发现表明,需要提供有关 SHV 中化学物质存在的准确信息(例如,使用产品成分标签或公共教育)。

相似文献

4
Prevalence and characteristics of secondhand smoke and secondhand vapour exposure among youth.
Tob Control. 2019 May;28(3):305-310. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2018-054265. Epub 2018 Jul 18.
5
U.S. Adult Attitudes About Electronic Vapor Product Use in Indoor Public Places.
Am J Prev Med. 2019 Jan;56(1):134-140. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2018.08.022. Epub 2018 Nov 19.
7
Aerosol, vapor, or chemicals? College student perceptions of harm from electronic cigarettes and support for a tobacco-free campus policy.
J Am Coll Health. 2022 Aug-Sep;70(6):1754-1760. doi: 10.1080/07448481.2020.1819293. Epub 2020 Sep 15.
10
Knowledge About E-Cigarette Constituents and Regulation: Results From a National Survey of U.S. Young Adults.
Nicotine Tob Res. 2015 Oct;17(10):1247-54. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntu276. Epub 2014 Dec 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Insights Into Electronic-Cigarette Perspectives: Smokers' Knowledge Attitudes and Practices at Hamad Medical Corporation, 2020.
Subst Abuse Rehabil. 2025 Aug 30;16:223-237. doi: 10.2147/SAR.S473116. eCollection 2025.
2
Electronic Cigarette Usage Patterns and Perceptions in Adult Australians.
Toxics. 2023 Mar 21;11(3):290. doi: 10.3390/toxics11030290.
3
Electronic Cigarettes: Exposure to Secondhand Vapors at a Long-Term Healthcare Company.
J Nurs Educ Pract. 2021 Feb;11(2):1-6. doi: 10.5430/jnep.v11n2p1. Epub 2020 Oct 15.
5
Statewide Prevalence of Smoke-Free and Vape-Free Homes, by Tobacco Product Use, Minnesota, 2018.
Prev Chronic Dis. 2020 Nov 12;17:E141. doi: 10.5888/pcd17.200133.
6
Vaping in the Workplace: Prevalence and Attitudes Among Employed US Adults.
J Occup Environ Med. 2021 Jan 1;63(1):10-17. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000002061.
7
Electronic cigarette survey characteristics.
J Community Hosp Intern Med Perspect. 2020 Jun 14;10(3):216-223. doi: 10.1080/20009666.2020.1766841.
9
It's Just Steam: a qualitative analysis of New Zealand ENDS users' perceptions of secondhand aerosol.
Tob Control. 2021 Jan;30(1):30-35. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2019-055368. Epub 2020 Feb 11.

本文引用的文献

2
3
Comparison of beliefs about e-cigarettes' harms and benefits among never users and ever users of e-cigarettes.
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2016 Jan 1;158:67-75. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2015.11.003. Epub 2015 Nov 12.
6
A Content Analysis of Electronic Cigarette Portrayal in Newspapers.
Tob Regul Sci. 2015 Apr;1(1):94-102. doi: 10.18001/TRS.1.1.9.
7
E-cigarettes generate high levels of aldehydes only in 'dry puff' conditions.
Addiction. 2015 Aug;110(8):1352-6. doi: 10.1111/add.12942. Epub 2015 May 20.
8
Food and Drug Administration tobacco regulation and product judgments.
Am J Prev Med. 2015 Apr;48(4):445-51. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2014.10.026. Epub 2015 Feb 25.
9
Hidden formaldehyde in e-cigarette aerosols.
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jan 22;372(4):392-4. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1413069.
10
Use of E-Cigarettes Among Current Smokers: Associations Among Reasons for Use, Quit Intentions, and Current Tobacco Use.
Nicotine Tob Res. 2015 Oct;17(10):1228-34. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntv003. Epub 2015 Jan 14.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验