Suppr超能文献

剖析决定实施以EPODE为基础的针对儿童肥胖的社区方法的因素:一项纵向多案例研究。

Unravelling the factors decisive to the implementation of EPODE-derived community approaches targeting childhood obesity: a longitudinal, multiple case study.

作者信息

van der Kleij Maria Rianne, Crone Mathilde, Reis Ria, Paulussen Theo

机构信息

Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Postbus 9600 zone V-0-P, Leiden, 2300 RC, The Netherlands.

Academic Workplace (AWP) Public Health Zuid-Holland Noord, Leiden, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2016 Sep 5;13(1):98. doi: 10.1186/s12966-016-0423-5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Implementation of intersectoral community approaches often fails due to a translational gap between the approach as intended and the approach as implemented in practice. Knowledge about the implementation determinants of such approaches is needed to facilitate future implementation processes.

METHODS

The implementation of five EPODE-derived intersectoral community approaches was studied longitudinally. Semi-structured interviews were held with 189 community stakeholders from four sectors to elucidate which determinants influenced implementation, and if an to which extent determinants differed across communities, sectors and over time. A framework approach was used to analyze our data.

RESULTS

Twenty-two key determinants of implementation were identified. Facilitators named were mostly proximal (stakeholder level), and barriers were mostly distal (context level). Key determinants varied greatly across sectors and over time, especially between the educational & health care sector and the private, welfare & sports sector. Only 'perceived importance of IACO goals' was identified as an universal implementation facilitator.

CONCLUSIONS

Striking differences in determinants were found across sectors and over time. Also, stakeholders expressed that possibilities to adapt the approach to the local context were needed to improve implementation. We therefore propose to develop sector- and time specific leads for implementation, which should be approved and amended (over time) by stakeholders. This so-called 'mutual adaptation' allows for the use of both scientific insights and practice-based knowledge, enabling program management and community stakeholders to collaboratively improve their implementation efforts.

摘要

背景

部门间社区方法的实施往往因预期方法与实际实施方法之间的转化差距而失败。需要了解此类方法的实施决定因素,以促进未来的实施过程。

方法

对五种源自EPODE的部门间社区方法的实施进行了纵向研究。与来自四个部门的189名社区利益相关者进行了半结构化访谈,以阐明哪些决定因素影响了实施,以及决定因素在不同社区、部门和不同时间内的差异程度。采用框架方法对我们的数据进行分析。

结果

确定了22个实施的关键决定因素。所提到的促进因素大多是近端的(利益相关者层面),而障碍大多是远端的(背景层面)。关键决定因素在不同部门和不同时间有很大差异,尤其是在教育与医疗部门以及私营、福利与体育部门之间。只有“对国际肥胖预防委员会目标的感知重要性”被确定为一个普遍的实施促进因素。

结论

在不同部门和不同时间发现了决定因素的显著差异。此外,利益相关者表示,需要有根据当地情况调整方法的可能性,以改善实施情况。因此,我们建议制定针对特定部门和时间的实施指南,这些指南应由利益相关者批准并(随着时间的推移)修订。这种所谓的“相互适应”允许利用科学见解和基于实践的知识,使项目管理和社区利益相关者能够共同改进他们的实施工作。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b02b/5011896/5abd0618d3a0/12966_2016_423_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验