Kumari Chandrawati, Varughese Bijo, Ramji Siddarth, Kapoor Seema
Pediatrics Genetic and Research Laboratory, Department of Pediatrics, New Medical Block, Opposite Old Casualty, Lok Nayak Hospital, Maulana Azad Medical College, New Delhi, 110002 India.
Department of Neonatology, Associated Lok Nayak Hospital, Maulana Azad Medical College, New Delhi, 110002 India.
Indian J Clin Biochem. 2016 Oct;31(4):414-22. doi: 10.1007/s12291-016-0557-x. Epub 2016 Feb 11.
Pre analytical process of extraction for accurate detection of organic acids is a crucial step in diagnosis of organic acidemias by GCMS analysis. This process is accomplished either by solid phase extraction (SPE) or by liquid-liquid extraction (LLE). Both extraction procedures are used in different metabolic laboratories all over the world. In this study we compared these two extraction procedures in respect of precision, accuracy, percent recovery of metabolites, number of metabolites isolated, time and cost in a resource constraint setup. We observed that the mean recovery from SPE was 84.1 % and by LLE it was 77.4 % (p value <0.05). Moreover, the average number of metabolites isolated by SPE and LLE was 161.8 ± 18.6 and 140.1 ± 20.4 respectively. The processing cost of LLE was economical. In a cost constraint setting using LLE may be the practical option if used for organic acid analysis.
用于准确检测有机酸的提取前处理过程是通过气相色谱 - 质谱联用(GCMS)分析诊断有机酸血症的关键步骤。该过程可通过固相萃取(SPE)或液 - 液萃取(LLE)来完成。这两种提取方法在世界各地不同的代谢实验室中都有使用。在本研究中,我们在资源有限的情况下,从精密度、准确度、代谢物回收率、分离出的代谢物数量、时间和成本等方面对这两种提取方法进行了比较。我们观察到,固相萃取的平均回收率为84.1%,液 - 液萃取为77.4%(p值<0.05)。此外,固相萃取和液 - 液萃取分离出的代谢物平均数量分别为161.8±18.6和140.1±20.4。液 - 液萃取的处理成本较低。在成本受限的情况下,如果用于有机酸分析,使用液 - 液萃取可能是实际的选择。