Knutson Jayme S, Gunzler Douglas D, Wilson Richard D, Chae John
From the Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (J.S.K., R.D.W., J.C.), Department of Medicine (D.D.G.), and Department of Biomedical Engineering (J.C.), Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH; Cleveland Functional Electrical Stimulation Center, OH (J.S.K., R.D.W., J.C.); and Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, MetroHealth Rehabilitation Institute of Ohio (J.S.K., R.D.W., J.C.) and the Center for Health Care Research and Policy (D.D.G.), MetroHealth Medical Center, Cleveland.
Stroke. 2016 Oct;47(10):2596-602. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.013791. Epub 2016 Sep 8.
It is unknown whether one method of neuromuscular electrical stimulation for poststroke upper limb rehabilitation is more effective than another. Our aim was to compare the effects of contralaterally controlled functional electrical stimulation (CCFES) with cyclic neuromuscular electrical stimulation (cNMES).
Stroke patients with chronic (>6 months) moderate to severe upper extremity hemiparesis (n=80) were randomized to receive 10 sessions/wk of CCFES- or cNMES-assisted hand opening exercise at home plus 20 sessions of functional task practice in the laboratory for 12 weeks. The task practice for the CCFES group was stimulation assisted. The primary outcome was change in Box and Block Test (BBT) score at 6 months post treatment. Upper extremity Fugl-Meyer and Arm Motor Abilities Test were also measured.
At 6 months post treatment, the CCFES group had greater improvement on the BBT, 4.6 (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.2-7.0), than the cNMES group, 1.8 (95% CI, 0.6-3.0), between-group difference of 2.8 (95% CI, 0.1-5.5), P=0.045. No significant between-group difference was found for the upper extremity Fugl-Meyer (P=0.888) or Arm Motor Abilities Test (P=0.096). Participants who had the largest improvements on BBT were <2 years post stroke with moderate (ie, not severe) hand impairment at baseline. Among these, the 6-month post-treatment BBT gains of the CCFES group, 9.6 (95% CI, 5.6-13.6), were greater than those of the cNMES group, 4.1 (95% CI, 1.7-6.5), between-group difference of 5.5 (95% CI, 0.8-10.2), P=0.023.
CCFES improved hand dexterity more than cNMES in chronic stroke survivors.
URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00891319.
目前尚不清楚一种用于中风后上肢康复的神经肌肉电刺激方法是否比另一种更有效。我们的目的是比较对侧控制功能性电刺激(CCFES)与周期性神经肌肉电刺激(cNMES)的效果。
80例患有慢性(>6个月)中度至重度上肢偏瘫的中风患者被随机分组,在家中接受每周10次的CCFES或cNMES辅助手部伸展运动,并在实验室进行20次功能性任务练习,为期12周。CCFES组的任务练习是在刺激辅助下进行的。主要结局是治疗后6个月时箱块测试(BBT)分数的变化。还测量了上肢Fugl-Meyer评分和手臂运动能力测试。
治疗后6个月,CCFES组在BBT上的改善更大,为4.6(95%置信区间[CI],2.2 - 7.0),高于cNMES组的1.8(95%CI,0.6 - 3.0),组间差异为2.8(95%CI,0.1 - 5.5),P = 0.045。在上肢Fugl-Meyer评分(P = 0.888)或手臂运动能力测试(P = 0.096)方面,未发现显著的组间差异。在BBT上改善最大的参与者是中风后<2年且基线时手部为中度(即非重度)损伤的患者。其中,CCFES组治疗后6个月的BBT提高值为9.6(95%CI,5.6 - 13.6),大于cNMES组的4.1(95%CI,1.7 - 6.5),组间差异为5.5(95%CI,0.8 - 10.2),P = 0.023。
在慢性中风幸存者中,CCFES比cNMES更能改善手部灵活性。