• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与三关节融合术相比,改良双关节融合术治疗僵硬性平足外翻失败率更高。

Increased Failure Rate of Modified Double Arthrodesis Compared With Triple Arthrodesis for Rigid Pes Planovalgus.

作者信息

Burrus M Tyrrell, Werner Brian C, Carr James B, Perumal Venkat, Park Joseph S

机构信息

Resident Physician, Division of Foot and Ankle Surgery, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA.

Resident Physician, Division of Foot and Ankle Surgery, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA.

出版信息

J Foot Ankle Surg. 2016 Nov-Dec;55(6):1169-1174. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2016.07.001. Epub 2016 Sep 7.

DOI:10.1053/j.jfas.2016.07.001
PMID:27614822
Abstract

For rigid pes planovalgus deformities, modified double and triple arthrodeses have had high union rates and subjective outcomes reported. Increased rates of talonavicular nonunions after modified double arthrodesis have led to concern regarding this procedure. A retrospective medical record review was performed of patients who had undergone either a modified double (n = 9) or triple (n = 7) arthrodesis for stage 3 pes planovalgus deformity. Radiographs were reviewed for hindfoot alignment, bony union, and hardware failure. Data from questionnaires, including the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure and the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score, were obtained. No significant differences were found between the cohorts in terms of preoperative radiographic parameters or patient characteristics. The modified double arthrodesis cohort demonstrated a nonunion rate of 44% (4 of 9), but the triple arthrodesis cohort had a 0% (0 of 7) nonunion rate (p = .042). The Foot and Ankle Ability Measure activities of daily living, Foot and Ankle Outcome Score activities of daily living, and Foot and Ankle Outcome Score quality of life scores were significantly worse for the modified double arthrodesis than for the triple arthrodesis group. For patients with stage 3 pes planovalgus, modified double arthrodesis resulted in significantly greater rates of nonunion and incomplete union, with significantly inferior subjective outcome scores compared with triple arthrodesis for the same indication.

摘要

对于僵硬性平足外翻畸形,改良双关节和三关节融合术的骨愈合率较高,且有相关主观疗效报道。改良双关节融合术后距舟关节不愈合率增加,引发了对该手术的担忧。对因Ⅲ期平足外翻畸形接受改良双关节融合术(n = 9)或三关节融合术(n = 7)的患者进行了回顾性病历审查。复查了X线片以评估后足对线、骨愈合及内固定失败情况。获取了包括足踝功能测量量表和足踝结局评分在内的问卷调查数据。两组患者术前影像学参数或患者特征方面未发现显著差异。改良双关节融合术组的不愈合率为44%(9例中的4例),而三关节融合术组的不愈合率为0%(7例中的0例)(p = 0.042)。改良双关节融合术组的足踝功能测量量表日常生活活动评分、足踝结局评分日常生活活动评分及足踝结局评分生活质量评分均显著低于三关节融合术组。对于Ⅲ期平足外翻患者,改良双关节融合术导致的不愈合和骨不连发生率显著更高,与相同适应证的三关节融合术相比,主观结局评分明显更低。

相似文献

1
Increased Failure Rate of Modified Double Arthrodesis Compared With Triple Arthrodesis for Rigid Pes Planovalgus.与三关节融合术相比,改良双关节融合术治疗僵硬性平足外翻失败率更高。
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2016 Nov-Dec;55(6):1169-1174. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2016.07.001. Epub 2016 Sep 7.
2
Treatment of severe, painful pes planovalgus deformity with hindfoot arthrodesis and wedge-shaped tricortical allograft.采用后足关节融合术及楔形三皮质同种异体骨移植治疗重度疼痛性扁平足外翻畸形。
Foot Ankle Int. 2007 May;28(5):569-74. doi: 10.3113/FAI.2007.0569.
3
Triple arthrodesis with lateral column lengthening for the treatment of planovalgus deformity.采用外侧柱延长的三关节融合术治疗扁平外翻畸形。
J Pediatr Orthop. 2011 Oct-Nov;31(7):773-82. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0b013e31822d3882.
4
Kinematic changes in patients with double arthrodesis of the hindfoot for realignment of planovalgus deformity.双后足关节融合术矫正平足-内翻畸形患者的运动学变化。
J Orthop Res. 2013 Apr;31(4):517-24. doi: 10.1002/jor.22269. Epub 2012 Nov 28.
5
[Double arthrodesis through a single medial incision approach for flatfoot].[经单一内侧切口入路行双关节融合治疗扁平足]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2014 Nov;28(11):1321-4.
6
Mid- to long-term outcome of 96 corrective hindfoot fusions in 84 patients with rigid flatfoot deformity.84例僵硬性平足畸形患者96例后足矫正融合术的中长期疗效
Bone Joint J. 2015 May;97-B(5):668-74. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.97B5.35063.
7
A comparison of two different techniques in the surgical treatment of flexible pes planovalgus: calcaneal lengthening and extra-articular subtalar arthrodesis.两种不同技术在柔韧性扁平外翻足手术治疗中的比较:跟骨延长术和关节外距下关节融合术。
J Pediatr Orthop B. 2009 Jul;18(4):167-75. doi: 10.1097/BPB.0b013e32832c2f32.
8
Tarsal coalition resection with pes planovalgus hindfoot reconstruction.跗骨联合切除术伴扁平外翻足后足重建术
J Surg Orthop Adv. 2011 Summer;20(2):102-5.
9
Surgical technique, fusion rates, and planovalgus foot deformity correction with naviculocuneiform fusion.手术技术、融合率以及跗跖骨间融合治疗足舟楔骨融合和足内翻畸形。
Foot Ankle Int. 2014 Mar;35(3):232-7. doi: 10.1177/1071100713517098. Epub 2013 Dec 19.
10
Management of the rigid arthritic flatfoot in adults: triple arthrodesis.成人僵硬性关节炎扁平足的治疗:三关节融合术。
Foot Ankle Clin. 2012 Jun;17(2):309-22. doi: 10.1016/j.fcl.2012.03.008.

引用本文的文献

1
Retrospective Review of Complications and Revision Rates Between Isolated Talonavicular vs Talonavicular and Subtalar (Double) Arthrodesis vs Triple Arthrodesis.孤立距舟关节融合术与距舟和距下(双)关节融合术及三关节融合术之间并发症和翻修率的回顾性研究
Foot Ankle Orthop. 2024 Feb 22;9(1):24730114241231559. doi: 10.1177/24730114241231559. eCollection 2024 Jan.
2
Adult-Acquired Flatfoot Deformity: Combined Talonavicular Arthrodesis and Calcaneal Displacement Osteotomy versus Double Arthrodesis.成人获得性平足畸形:距舟关节融合联合跟骨移位截骨术与双关节融合术的比较
J Clin Med. 2022 Feb 5;11(3):840. doi: 10.3390/jcm11030840.
3
Triple Arthrodesis for Adult-Acquired Flatfoot Deformity.
成人获得性平足畸形的三关节融合术
Foot Ankle Orthop. 2019 Aug 19;4(3):2473011419849609. doi: 10.1177/2473011419849609. eCollection 2019 Jul.
4
Double versus triple arthrodesis for adult-acquired flatfoot deformity due to stage III posterior tibial tendon insufficiency: a prospective comparative study of two cohorts.双踝关节融合与三关节融合治疗成年人获得性平足畸形伴Ⅲ期胫后肌腱功能不全:两个队列前瞻性对比研究。
Int Orthop. 2021 Sep;45(9):2219-2229. doi: 10.1007/s00264-021-05041-1. Epub 2021 Apr 25.