Jaber M
Inserm U-1084, laboratoire de neurosciences expérimentales et cliniques, LNEC, université de Poitiers, CHU de Poitiers, bâtiment B36, 1, rue Georges-Bonnet, BP 633, TSA 51106, 86022 Poitiers cedex, France.
Encephale. 2017 Apr;43(2):170-175. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2016.03.018. Epub 2016 Sep 9.
Autism spectrum disorders (ASD) are neurodevelopmental disorders associated with disturbances in communication, social interactions, cognition and affect. ASD are also accompanied by complex movement disorders, including ataxia. A special focus of recent research in this area is made on the striatum and the cerebellum, two structures known not only to control movement but also to be involved in cognitive functions such as memory and language. Dysfunction within the motor system may be associated with abnormal movements in ASD that are translated into ataxia, abnormal pattern of righting, gait sequencing, development of walking, and hand positioning. This line of study may generate new knowledge and understanding of motor symptoms associated with ASD and aims to deliver fresh perspectives for early diagnosis and therapeutic strategies against ASD.
Despite the relative paucity of research in this area (compared to the social, linguistic, and behavioural disturbances in ASD), there is evidence that the frontostriatal motor system and/or the cerebellar motor systems may be the site of dysfunction in ASD. Indeed, the cerebellum seems to be essential in the development of basic social capabilities, communication, repetitive/restrictive behaviors, and motor and cognitive behaviors that are all impaired in ASD. Cerebellar neuropathology including cerebellar hypoplasia and reduced cerebellar Purkinje cell numbers are the most consistent neuropathologies linked to ASD. The functional state of the cerebellum and its impact on brain function in ASD is the focus of this review. This review starts by recapitulating historical findings pointing towards an implication of the cerebellum, and to a lesser extent the basal ganglia structures, in TSA. We then detail the structure/function of the cerebellum at the regional and cellular levels before describing human and animal findings indicating a role of the cerebellum and basal ganglia in ASD.
Several studies have attempted to identify the nature of the motor system dysfunction in ASD, and it became apparent that the motor fronto-striatal and cerebellar systems are major sites of dysfunction in this psychiatric illness. Anomalies in these structures have been revealed both at the anatomical and functional levels in human patients as well as in animal models. These models are obtained by manipulation of genes that are often implicated in glutamate transmission, by lesions of brain structures among which the cerebellum, by pharmacological treatment with drugs such as the Valproate or by maternal infections with bacterial membrane extracts of double stranded RNA mimicking a viral infection.
The "cognitive approach" has dominated ASD research for three decades and led to the design of interventional strategies, which have yielded satisfactory results. Nevertheless, new approaches and alternative hypotheses on the aetiology and diagnosis of ASD are needed. Research focused on motor rather than psychiatric symptoms may have a greater potential to elucidate the neurobiological basis of ASD.
自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)是一种神经发育障碍,与沟通、社交互动、认知和情感障碍有关。ASD还伴有复杂的运动障碍,包括共济失调。该领域最近的研究特别关注纹状体和小脑,这两个结构不仅已知可控制运动,还参与记忆和语言等认知功能。运动系统功能障碍可能与ASD中的异常运动有关,这些异常运动表现为共济失调、异常的翻正模式、步态序列、行走发育和手部定位。这一系列研究可能会产生关于与ASD相关的运动症状的新知识和理解,并旨在为ASD的早期诊断和治疗策略提供新的视角。
尽管该领域的研究相对较少(与ASD中的社交、语言和行为障碍相比),但有证据表明额纹状体运动系统和/或小脑运动系统可能是ASD功能障碍的部位。事实上,小脑似乎在基本社交能力、沟通、重复/限制性行为以及运动和认知行为的发展中起着至关重要的作用,而这些在ASD中均受到损害。小脑神经病理学,包括小脑发育不全和小脑浦肯野细胞数量减少,是与ASD最一致的神经病理学表现。小脑的功能状态及其对ASD脑功能的影响是本综述的重点。本综述首先回顾历史研究结果,这些结果表明小脑以及在较小程度上基底神经节结构与抽动秽语综合征(TSA)有关。然后,我们在描述表明小脑和基底神经节在ASD中作用的人类和动物研究结果之前,详细阐述小脑在区域和细胞水平的结构/功能。
多项研究试图确定ASD中运动系统功能障碍的性质,很明显运动额纹状体和小脑系统是这种精神疾病功能障碍的主要部位。在人类患者以及动物模型的解剖和功能水平上均发现了这些结构的异常。这些模型通过操纵通常与谷氨酸传递有关的基因、通过小脑等脑结构损伤、通过丙戊酸盐等药物的药物治疗或通过母体感染模仿病毒感染的双链RNA细菌膜提取物获得。
“认知方法”在ASD研究中占据主导地位三十年,并导致了干预策略的设计,这些策略取得了令人满意的结果。然而,需要关于ASD病因和诊断的新方法和替代假设。专注于运动而非精神症状的研究可能更有潜力阐明ASD的神经生物学基础。