• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

胆管癌:新一代测序在临床管理中的应用

Biliary cancer: Utility of next-generation sequencing for clinical management.

作者信息

Javle Milind, Bekaii-Saab Tanios, Jain Apurva, Wang Ying, Kelley Robin Katie, Wang Kai, Kang Hyunseon C, Catenacci Daniel, Ali Siraj, Krishnan Sunil, Ahn Daniel, Bocobo Andrea Grace, Zuo Mingxin, Kaseb Ahmed, Miller Vincent, Stephens Philip J, Meric-Bernstam Funda, Shroff Rachna, Ross Jeffrey

机构信息

Department of Gastrointestinal (GI) Medical Oncology, UT-MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.

Division of Medical Oncology, Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio.

出版信息

Cancer. 2016 Dec 15;122(24):3838-3847. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30254. Epub 2016 Sep 13.

DOI:10.1002/cncr.30254
PMID:27622582
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Biliary tract cancers (BTCs) typically present at an advanced stage, and systemic chemotherapy is often of limited benefit.

METHODS

Hybrid capture-based comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) was performed for 412 intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas (IHCCAs), 57 extrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas (EHCCAs), and 85 gallbladder carcinomas (GBCAs). The mutational profile was correlated with the clinical outcome of standard and experimental therapies for 321 patients. Clinical variables, detected mutations, and administered therapies were correlated with overall survival (OS) in a Cox regression model.

RESULTS

The most frequent genetic aberrations (GAs) observed were tumor protein 53 (TP53; 27%), cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2A/B (CDKN2A/B; 27%), KRAS (22%), AT-rich interactive domain-containing protein 1A (ARID1A; 18%), and isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1; 16%) in IHCCA; KRAS (42%), TP53 (40%), CDKN2A/B (17%), and SMAD4 (21%) in EHCCA; and TP53 (59%), CDKN2A/B (19%), ARID1A (13%), and ERBB2 (16%) in GBCA. Fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR; 11%) and IDH mutations (20%) were mostly limited to IHCCA but appeared to be mutually exclusive. In the IHCCA group, TP53 and KRAS mutations were associated significantly with poor OS, whereas FGFR2 mutations were associated with improved OS (P = .001), a younger age at onset, and female sex. IDH1/2 mutations were not prognostic. In a multivariate model, the effects of TP53 and FGFR GAs remained significant (P < .05). Patients with FGFR GAs had superior OS with FGFR-targeted therapy versus standard regimens (P = .006). Targeted therapy in IHCCA was associated with a numerical OS improvement (P = .07).

CONCLUSIONS

This is the largest clinically annotated data set of BTC cases with CGP and indicates the potential of CGP for improving outcomes. CGP should be strongly considered in the management of BTC patients. Cancer 2016;122:3838-3847. © 2016 American Cancer Society.

摘要

背景

胆管癌(BTC)通常在晚期出现,全身化疗往往获益有限。

方法

对412例肝内胆管癌(IHCCA)、57例肝外胆管癌(EHCCA)和85例胆囊癌(GBCA)进行基于杂交捕获的综合基因组分析(CGP)。将突变谱与321例患者的标准和实验性治疗的临床结果相关联。在Cox回归模型中,将临床变量、检测到的突变和给予的治疗与总生存期(OS)相关联。

结果

在IHCCA中观察到的最常见的基因畸变(GA)是肿瘤蛋白53(TP53;27%)、细胞周期蛋白依赖性激酶抑制剂2A/B(CDKN2A/B;27%)、KRAS(22%)、富含AT的相互作用结构域蛋白1A(ARID1A;18%)和异柠檬酸脱氢酶1(IDH1;16%);在EHCCA中为KRAS(42%)、TP53(40%)、CDKN2A/B(17%)和SMAD4(21%);在GBCA中为TP53(59%)、CDKN2A/B(19%)、ARID1A(13%)和ERBB2(16%)。成纤维细胞生长因子受体(FGFR;11%)和IDH突变(20%)大多局限于IHCCA,但似乎相互排斥。在IHCCA组中,TP53和KRAS突变与较差的OS显著相关,而FGFR2突变与较好的OS相关(P = 0.001)、发病年龄较轻和女性性别。IDH1/2突变无预后意义。在多变量模型中,TP53和FGFR GA的影响仍然显著(P < 0.05)。与标准方案相比,FGFR GA患者接受FGFR靶向治疗的OS更好(P = 0.006)。IHCCA中的靶向治疗与OS的数值改善相关(P = 0.07)。

结论

这是最大的具有CGP注释的BTC病例临床数据集,表明CGP在改善预后方面的潜力。在BTC患者的管理中应强烈考虑CGP。《癌症》2016年;122:3838 - 3847。©2016美国癌症协会。

相似文献

1
Biliary cancer: Utility of next-generation sequencing for clinical management.胆管癌:新一代测序在临床管理中的应用
Cancer. 2016 Dec 15;122(24):3838-3847. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30254. Epub 2016 Sep 13.
2
Genetic Determinants of Outcome in Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma.肝内胆管癌结局的遗传决定因素。
Hepatology. 2021 Sep;74(3):1429-1444. doi: 10.1002/hep.31829.
3
Mutation profiling in cholangiocarcinoma: prognostic and therapeutic implications.胆管癌的突变谱分析:预后及治疗意义
PLoS One. 2014 Dec 23;9(12):e115383. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0115383. eCollection 2014.
4
Comprehensive Molecular Profiling of Intrahepatic and Extrahepatic Cholangiocarcinomas: Potential Targets for Intervention.肝内和肝外胆管癌的全面分子分析:干预的潜在靶点。
Clin Cancer Res. 2018 Sep 1;24(17):4154-4161. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-0078. Epub 2018 May 30.
5
Therapeutic relevance of targeted sequencing in management of patients with advanced biliary tract cancer: DNA damage repair gene mutations as a predictive biomarker.靶向测序在晚期胆道癌患者管理中的治疗相关性:DNA 损伤修复基因突变作为预测生物标志物。
Eur J Cancer. 2019 Oct;120:31-39. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2019.07.022. Epub 2019 Aug 30.
6
Mutational spectrum and precision oncology for biliary tract carcinoma.胆管癌的突变谱和精准肿瘤学。
Theranostics. 2021 Mar 4;11(10):4585-4598. doi: 10.7150/thno.56539. eCollection 2021.
7
Systemic treatment of advanced or recurrent biliary tract cancer.晚期或复发性胆道癌的系统治疗。
Biosci Trends. 2020 Nov 4;14(5):328-341. doi: 10.5582/bst.2020.03240. Epub 2020 Aug 24.
8
Cell of origin in biliary tract cancers and clinical implications.胆管癌的起源细胞及其临床意义。
JHEP Rep. 2021 Jan 19;3(2):100226. doi: 10.1016/j.jhepr.2021.100226. eCollection 2021 Apr.
9
The landscape of targeted therapies for cholangiocarcinoma: current status and emerging targets.胆管癌靶向治疗的现状与新兴靶点
Oncotarget. 2016 Jul 19;7(29):46750-46767. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.8775.
10
Multigene mutational profiling of cholangiocarcinomas identifies actionable molecular subgroups.胆管癌的多基因突变谱分析确定了可采取行动的分子亚组。
Oncotarget. 2014 May 15;5(9):2839-52. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.1943.

引用本文的文献

1
Circulating Tumor DNA and Tissue Testing for Pancreatobiliary Tumors.胰腺胆管肿瘤的循环肿瘤DNA与组织检测
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Sep 2;8(9):e2531373. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.31373.
2
Ivosidenib for IDH1-Mutant Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: Insights From a Multicenter Real-World Study.艾伏尼布治疗异柠檬酸脱氢酶1(IDH1)突变型肝内胆管癌:一项多中心真实世界研究的见解
Liver Int. 2025 Sep;45(9):e70295. doi: 10.1111/liv.70295.
3
Successful Treatment of BRAF V600E-Mutant Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma With Encorafenib, Binimetinib, and Cetuximab.
恩考芬尼、比美替尼和西妥昔单抗成功治疗BRAF V600E突变型肝内胆管癌
Cureus. 2025 Jun 18;17(6):e86263. doi: 10.7759/cureus.86263. eCollection 2025 Jun.
4
Regorafenib plus modified gemcitabine-oxaliplatin in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer. The randomized phase Ib/II BREGO study.瑞戈非尼联合改良吉西他滨-奥沙利铂治疗晚期胆管癌。随机Ib/II期BREGO研究。
Oncologist. 2025 Jun 4;30(6). doi: 10.1093/oncolo/oyaf080.
5
Response to crizotinib in advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma with ZKSCAN1-MET fusion and MET amplification: case reports and literature review.具有ZKSCAN1-MET融合和MET扩增的晚期肝内胆管癌对克唑替尼的反应:病例报告与文献综述
Discov Oncol. 2025 Jun 14;16(1):1107. doi: 10.1007/s12672-025-02930-4.
6
Development and challenges in the treatment of advanced gallbladder cancer (Review).晚期胆囊癌治疗的进展与挑战(综述)
Oncol Lett. 2025 Jun 3;30(2):382. doi: 10.3892/ol.2025.15128. eCollection 2025 Aug.
7
Genomic landscape of biliary tract cancer and corresponding targeted treatment strategies.胆管癌的基因组图谱及相应的靶向治疗策略。
Int J Clin Oncol. 2025 Apr 25. doi: 10.1007/s10147-025-02761-x.
8
Biomarkers and Management of Cholangiocarcinoma: Unveiling New Horizons for Precision Therapy.胆管癌的生物标志物与管理:开启精准治疗的新视野
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Apr 6;17(7):1243. doi: 10.3390/cancers17071243.
9
Clinicomolecular Profile and Efficacy of Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2)-Targeted Therapy for -Amplified Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer.人表皮生长因子受体2(HER2)靶向治疗在HER2扩增的晚期胆管癌中的临床分子特征及疗效
JCO Precis Oncol. 2025 Apr;9:e2400718. doi: 10.1200/PO-24-00718. Epub 2025 Apr 10.
10
Genetic predictors of postoperative recurrence in node-negative intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.淋巴结阴性肝内胆管癌术后复发的基因预测指标
Updates Surg. 2025 Apr 2. doi: 10.1007/s13304-025-02189-y.