Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Stanford School of Medicine, 300 Pasteur Drive, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Stanford Cardiovascular Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017 Oct 1;18(10):1153-1162. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jew121.
Left ventricular (LV) strain provides incremental values to LV ejection fraction (LVEF) in predicting outcome. We sought to investigate if similar relationship is observed between left atrial (LA) emptying fraction and LA strain.
In this study, we selected 50 healthy subjects, 50 patients with dilated, 50 hypertrophic, and 50 infiltrative (light-chain (AL) amyloidosis) cardiomyopathy (CMP). Echocardiographic measures included LVEF and LA emptying fraction as well as LV and LA longitudinal strain (LVLS and LALS). After regression analysis, comparison of least square means of LA strain among aetiologies was performed. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and coefficient of variation (COV) were used in the assessment of variability and reproducibility of LV and LA metrics. The mean LVLS and all LA metrics were impaired in patients with all CMP compared with healthy subjects. In contrast to the moderate relationship between LVEF and LVLS (r = -0.51, P < 0.001), there was a strong linear relationship between LA emptying fraction and LA strain (r = 0.87, P < 0.001). In multiple regression analysis, total LA strain was associated with LVLS (β = -0.48, P < 0.001), lateral E/e' (β = -0.24, P < 0.001), age (β = -0.21, P < 0.001), and heart rate (β = -0.14, P = 0.02). The least square mean of LA strain adjusted for the parameters was not different among aetiologies (ANOVA P = 0.82). The ICC (>0.77) and COV (<13) were acceptable.
In contrast to LV measures, there is a strong linear relationship between volumetric and longitudinal deformation indices of left atrium irrespective of CMP aetiology. Either LA emptying fraction or LA strain could be used as an important parameter in predictive models.
左心室(LV)应变在预测预后方面提供了比 LV 射血分数(LVEF)更高的价值。我们试图研究左心房(LA)排空分数与 LA 应变之间是否存在类似的关系。
在这项研究中,我们选择了 50 名健康受试者、50 名扩张型心肌病(DCM)患者、50 名肥厚型心肌病(HCM)患者和 50 名浸润性心肌病(轻链(AL)淀粉样变性)患者。超声心动图测量包括 LVEF 和 LA 排空分数以及 LV 和 LA 纵向应变(LVLS 和 LALS)。在回归分析后,比较了病因学之间的 LA 应变最小二乘均值。采用组内相关系数(ICC)和变异系数(COV)评估 LV 和 LA 指标的变异性和可重复性。与健康受试者相比,所有 CMP 患者的 LVLS 和所有 LA 指标均受损。与 LVEF 和 LVLS 之间的中度关系(r=-0.51,P<0.001)相反,LA 排空分数与 LA 应变之间存在强线性关系(r=0.87,P<0.001)。在多元回归分析中,总 LA 应变与 LVLS(β=-0.48,P<0.001)、侧壁 E/e'(β=-0.24,P<0.001)、年龄(β=-0.21,P<0.001)和心率(β=-0.14,P=0.02)相关。经参数调整后的 LA 应变最小二乘均值在病因学之间无差异(方差分析 P=0.82)。ICC(>0.77)和 COV(<13)均可接受。
与 LV 测量值相比,左心房容积和纵向变形指数之间存在很强的线性关系,与 CMP 病因无关。LA 排空分数或 LA 应变都可以作为预测模型中的一个重要参数。