Suppr超能文献

2 型糖尿病与缺血性和非缺血性心力衰竭的预后意义。

Prognostic Implications of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Ischemic and Nonischemic Heart Failure.

机构信息

Cardiology Unit, Department of Medicine K2, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

Department of Cardiology and Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.

出版信息

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Sep 27;68(13):1404-1416. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.06.061.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Heart failure (HF) is a common and serious complication in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The prognosis of ischemic HF and impact of revascularization in such patients have not been investigated fully in a patient population representing everyday practice.

OBJECTIVES

This study examined the impact of ischemic versus nonischemic HF and previous revascularization on long-term prognosis in an unselected population of patients with and without T2DM.

METHODS

Patients stratified by diabetes status and ischemic or nonischemic HF and history of revascularization in the Swedish Heart Failure Registry (SwedeHF) from 2003 to 2011 were followed up for mortality predictors and longevity. A propensity score analysis was applied to evaluate the impact of previous revascularization.

RESULTS

Among 35,163 HF patients, those with T2DM were younger, and 90% had 1 or more associated comorbidities. Ischemic heart disease (IHD) occurred in 62% of patients with T2DM and 47% of those without T2DM, of whom 53% and 48%, respectively, had previously undergone revascularization. T2DM predicted mortality regardless of the presence of IHD, with adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of 1.40 (1.33 to 1.46) and 1.30 (1.22 to 1.39) in those with and without IHD, respectively. Patients with both T2DM and IHD had the highest mortality, which was further accentuated by the absence of previous revascularization (adjusted HR: 0.82 in favor of such treatment; 95% CI: 0.75 to 0.91). Propensity score adjustment did not change these results (HR: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.78 to 0.96). Revascularization did not abolish the impact of T2DM, which predicted mortality in those with (HR: 1.36; 95% CI: 1.24 to 1.48) and without (HR: 1.45; 95% CI: 1.33 to 1.56) a history of revascularization.

CONCLUSIONS

Ninety percent of HF patients with T2DM have preventable comorbidities. IHD in patients with T2DM had an especially negative influence on mortality, an impact that was beneficially influenced by previous revascularization.

摘要

背景

心力衰竭(HF)是 2 型糖尿病(T2DM)的常见且严重的并发症。在代表日常实践的患者人群中,尚未充分研究缺血性 HF 和此类患者血运重建的预后。

目的

本研究在瑞典心力衰竭注册研究(SwedeHF)中,调查了未经选择的 T2DM 患者和非 T2DM 患者中缺血性 HF 与非缺血性 HF 以及既往血运重建对长期预后的影响。

方法

根据糖尿病状态和缺血性或非缺血性 HF 以及 2003 年至 2011 年瑞典心力衰竭注册研究中的血运重建史对患者进行分层,随访死亡率预测因素和生存情况。应用倾向评分分析评估既往血运重建的影响。

结果

在 35163 例 HF 患者中,T2DM 患者年龄较小,90%合并 1 种或多种合并症。缺血性心脏病(IHD)在 T2DM 患者中占 62%,在非 T2DM 患者中占 47%,其中分别有 53%和 48%既往接受过血运重建。无论是否存在 IHD,T2DM 均预测死亡率,伴有 IHD 的患者校正危险比(HR)和 95%置信区间(CI)为 1.40(1.33 至 1.46),无 IHD 的患者为 1.30(1.22 至 1.39)。同时患有 T2DM 和 IHD 的患者死亡率最高,且既往未行血运重建时更为明显(校正 HR:有利于治疗的 0.82;95%CI:0.75 至 0.91)。倾向评分调整并未改变这些结果(HR:0.87;95%CI:0.78 至 0.96)。血运重建并未消除 T2DM 的影响,T2DM 患者行血运重建后死亡率升高(HR:1.36;95%CI:1.24 至 1.48),未行血运重建后死亡率升高(HR:1.45;95%CI:1.33 至 1.56)。

结论

90%的 T2DM 心力衰竭患者存在可预防的合并症。T2DM 患者的 IHD 对死亡率有特别不利的影响,而既往血运重建则可带来有益影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验