Citraro Rita, Russo Emilio, Leo Antonio, Russo Roberto, Avagliano Carmen, Navarra Michele, Calignano Antonio, De Sarro Giovambattista
Science of Health Department, Clinical Pharmacology Unit, School of Medicine, University "Magna Graecia" of Catanzaro, Italy.
Department of Pharmacy, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy.
Eur J Pharmacol. 2016 Nov 15;791:523-534. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2016.09.029. Epub 2016 Sep 20.
We evaluated the effects of ACEA (selective cannabinoid (CB) receptor agonist), WIN 55,212-2 mesylate (WIN; non-selective CB and CB receptor agonist) and N-palmitoylethanolamine (PEA; an endogenous fatty acid of ethanolamide) in DBA/2 mice, a genetic model of reflex audiogenic epilepsy. PEA, ACEA or WIN intraperitoneal (i.p.) administration decreased the severity of tonic-clonic seizures. We also studied the effects of PEA, WIN or ACEA after co-administration with NIDA-41020 (CB receptor antagonist) or GW6471 (PPAR-α antagonist) and compared the effects of WIN, ACEA and PEA in order to clarify their mechanisms of action. PEA has anticonvulsant features in DBA/2 mice mainly through PPAR-α and likely indirectly on CB receptors, whereas ACEA and WIN act through CB receptors. The co-administration of ineffective doses of ACEA, PEA and WIN with some antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) was examined in order to identify potential pharmacological interactions in DBA/2 mice. We found that PEA, ACEA and WIN co-administration potentiated the efficacy of carbamazepine, diazepam, felbamate, gabapentin, phenobarbital, topiramate and valproate and PEA only also that of oxcarbazepine and lamotrigine whereas, their co-administration with levetiracetam and phenytoin did not have effects. PEA, ACEA or WIN administration did not significantly influence the total plasma and brain levels of AEDs; therefore, it can be concluded that the observed potentiation was only of pharmacodynamic nature. In conclusion, PEA, ACEA and WIN show anticonvulsant effects in DBA/2 mice and potentiate the effects several AEDs suggesting a possible therapeutic relevance of these drugs and their mechanisms of action.
我们评估了ACEA(选择性大麻素(CB)受体激动剂)、WIN 55,212-2甲磺酸盐(WIN;非选择性CB1和CB2受体激动剂)和N-棕榈酰乙醇胺(PEA;一种内源性脂肪酸乙醇酰胺)对DBA/2小鼠(反射性听源性癫痫的遗传模型)的影响。腹腔注射(i.p.)PEA、ACEA或WIN可降低强直性阵挛性癫痫发作的严重程度。我们还研究了PEA、WIN或ACEA与NIDA-41020(CB1受体拮抗剂)或GW6471(PPAR-α拮抗剂)联合给药后的作用,并比较了WIN、ACEA和PEA的作用,以阐明其作用机制。PEA在DBA/2小鼠中具有抗惊厥特性,主要通过PPAR-α,可能间接作用于CB受体,而ACEA和WIN则通过CB受体起作用。为了确定DBA/2小鼠中潜在的药物相互作用,我们研究了无效剂量的ACEA、PEA和WIN与一些抗癫痫药物(AEDs)的联合给药情况。我们发现,PEA、ACEA和WIN联合给药可增强卡马西平、地西泮、非氨酯、加巴喷丁、苯巴比妥、托吡酯和丙戊酸的疗效,PEA单独使用还可增强奥卡西平和拉莫三嗪的疗效,而它们与左乙拉西坦和苯妥英联合给药则没有效果。PEA、ACEA或WIN给药对AEDs 的血浆和脑总水平没有显著影响;因此,可以得出结论,观察到的增强作用仅具有药效学性质。总之,PEA、ACEA和WIN在DBA/2小鼠中显示出抗惊厥作用,并增强了几种AEDs的作用,表明这些药物及其作用机制可能具有治疗相关性。